UPC CoA 66/2026
EP2581193 · Process for the manufacture of implants or intermediate products of such implants as well as implants and intermediate products obtained by such process
- Case details
- StatusClaim dismissedActionOtherCategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Claimants
- SILIMED Indústria de Implantes Ltda.Operating co.
Representatives- John Brunner-Carpmaels & Ransford
Respondents- Polytech Health & Aesthetics GmbHOperating co.
Representatives- Mario Araujo Edo-Boehmert & Boehmert
- Division
- Court of Appeal
- Judges
- Technology
- Mechanical engineeringOther special machines
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Jun 29, 2026
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Judge Klaus Grabinski | Locked |
At the UPC: SILIMED Indústria de Implantes Ltda. (2 cases)·Polytech Health & Aesthetics GmbH (2 cases)
This dispute contains 1 other proceedings
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Court of Appeal·2026
- 2026-06-29Application for a review of the Registrar's decisionPublic
Summary: The President of the UPC Court of Appeal rejected SILIMED's application for review of the Registrar's decision of 10 April 2026 that had denied removal of Polytech's opt-out of EP 2 581 193. The President held that SILIMED failed to demonstrate that Polytech was not entitled to opt-out the patent at the time of filing (30 March 2023), because the German court transfer order became final only on 5 January 2026 and had no retroactive effect under applicable German law.
Show the legal issues (5)
- Removal of unauthorized opt-out under R.5A RoP
- Entitlement to opt-out under Art. 83(3) UPCA
- Retroactive effect of German court entitlement transfer order
- Entitlement to be registered as proprietor at time of opt-out filing under national law
- Requirements of R.8.5(a) and R.8.5(c) RoP for removal of unauthorized opt-out
- Review%20Decision%20_%20President%20of%20the%20Court%20of%20Appeal_of_29-06-2026.final_.pdf2026-06-29EN