UPClytics
View all cases
Case details
Status
Case Closed
Action
Appeal
Category
Main appeal
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Court of Appeal
Language
English
First decided
Oct 14, 2025
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
Median days to first decision
All UPC124
Judge Rian KaldenLocked
Judge Patricia RombachLocked
Judge Ingeborg SimonssonLocked
Judge Max TilmannLocked
Judge Lorenzo ParriniLocked

At the UPC: Kodak Group (52 cases)·Fujifilm Group (52 cases)

Decisions
  • 2025-10-14
    Appeal RoP220.2Public

    Summary: The Court of Appeal partly set aside a first-instance order on penalty payments in Fujifilm v Kodak. The court clarified the UPC penalty system under Rule 354.3 RoP, holding that a penalty order can be issued separately after the main decision. The court replaced the first-instance penalty orders with new orders: EUR 2,500/day from 23 July 2025 to 4 August 2025 and EUR 10,000/day thereafter for continued non-compliance by Kodak with orders on information, destruction, recall and removal from channels of commerce.

    Show the legal issues (4)
    • Penalty payments (Rule 354.3 RoP)
    • Non-compliance with main decision orders
    • Separate penalty order after main decision
    • Proportionality and deterrence of penalties
Document titleDatePublic
Case closed2025-10-15Not public
Decision2025-10-14Not public
Final Order2025-10-14Public
Communication2025-10-13Not public
Oral procedure closed2025-10-02Not public
Other document Appellant2025-10-02Not public
Order2025-09-23Not public
Order2025-09-23Public
Oral procedure opened2025-09-22Not public
Written procedure closed2025-09-22Not public