UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CoA 737/2025

Aug 12, 2025·EP2515768 +1 more: MOTOR-DRIVEN SURGICAL CUTTING INSTRUMENT WITH ELECTRIC ACTUATOR DIRECTIONAL CONTROL ASSEMBLY

Case details
Status
Case Closed
Action
Generic
Category
Main Appeal
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Tilmann Müller-Stoy (Bardehle Pagenberg)
Respondents
Reps: Peter Koch (PENFORCE)
Division
Court of Appeal
Technology
Electrical Components
Language
German
Decisions
  • 2025-08-15
    Application Rop 223

    The Court of Appeal dismissed RiVOLUTiON's application for suspensive effect of its appeal against a preliminary injunction granted by the Munich Local Division in favour of Cilag GmbH International. The court found no manifest error in the first-instance order, noting that the grounds of the decision were not yet available and therefore the required threshold for manifest error could not be met.

    Legal issues:Suspensive effect of appeal (Article 74 UPCA, Rule 223 RoP)Manifest error standardPending grounds of first-instance decisionPreliminary injunction in PI proceedings
Documents
Document titleDatePublic
action.phaseChange.caseClose2025-09-29Not public
Headnote-and-Keywords2025-08-15Not public
Outcome of the Order2025-08-15Not public
Order suspensive effect2025-08-15Public
Panel-Appointment2025-08-13Not public
Receipt2025-08-13Not public
AntragAufschiebendeWirkung2025-08-12Not public
Anlage_BK12025-08-12Not public
Anlage_BK22025-08-12Not public