UPC Analytics
ENDE
Overview · Filed: Aug 16, 2025

UPC_CoA_755/2025

WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TERMINAL DEVICE, WIRELESS COMMUNICATION BASE STATION DEVICE, AND RESOURCE REGION SETTING METHOD

AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealAppealCase Closed
OverviewDecisionsCitationsDocumentsTimeline
Parties

Claimants

  • Sun Patent Trust
Reps: Sabine Agé (HOYNG ROKH MONEGIER); Caroline Levesque (HOYNG ROKH MONEGIER)

Respondents

  • Vivo Mobile Communication Co., Ltd.
  • Vivo Tech GmbH
  • Vivo Mobile Communication Iberia SL
Reps: Georg Rauh (VOSSIUS)
Judges
  • Klaus Grabinski
  • Emmanuel Gougé
  • Peter Blok
Patents
  • EP 3 407 524SEP · LTE
  • EP 3 852 468SEP · 5G NR
CPC codes: H04L5/0016, H04W4/06, H04W72/542, H04L5/0055, H04W72/0453, H04L27/26524, H04L27/2634, H04L5/001, H04W72/21

Sector: Telecommunications

Outcome
Dismissed
Filed: Aug 16, 2025
First decided: Sep 23, 2025
Last decision: Oct 31, 2025
Language: English

Court of Appeal dismissed Vivo's request to stay the first-instance proceedings (UPC_CFI_361/2025 and UPC_CFI_263/2025) and extend time limits pending the appeal proceedings. The CoA held that R.21.2 RoP (stay in context of preliminary objection appeal) cannot be applied by anticipation before an appeal against the preliminary objection order has been lodged. Under R.295 RoP, the CoA is generally not the appropriate body to decide on stays of first-instance proceedings, as the CFI is better placed to manage its own case.

Open on UPC Registry