UPC CoA 887/2025
Sep 29, 2025·EP3522755 Unitary patent · PIECE OF FURNITURE IN WHICH A WASHING MACHINE CAN BE PLACED AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURE THEREOF
- Case details
- StatusCase Closed (Withdrawn)ActionAppealCategoryMain appeal
- Parties
- Claimants
- Industriebeteiligungs- und Beratungs GmbHOperating co.
- BEGA Consult Internationale Handelsagentur GmbH & Co. KGOperating co.
- BEGA BBK Sp. z o.o. sp. KOperating co.
- NEG Novex Großhandelsgesellschaft für Elektro- und Haustechnik GmbHOperating co.
Representatives- Volkmar Henke-Bardehle Pagenberg
Respondents- Washtower IP B.V.Operating co.
- Washtower B.V.Operating co.
Representatives- Peter van Schijndel-Hoyng Rokh Monegier
- Division
- Court of Appeal
- Technology
- Other fieldsConsumer products · Other consumer goods
- Language
- English
- First decided
- Sep 24, 2025
- Last decision
- Mar 3, 2026
- EPO Opposition
- BEGA BBK Sp. z o.o. sp. K.Withdrawn2026-01-02
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Judge Klaus Grabinski | Locked |
| Judge Emmanuel Gougé | Locked |
| Judge Peter Blok | Locked |
| Judge Michel Abello | Locked |
| Judge Paolo Crippa | Locked |
At the UPC: Industriebeteiligungs- und Beratungs GmbH (4 cases)·Washtower IP B.V. (6 cases)
This dispute contains 4 other proceedings
UPC CFI 1339/2025·UPC CFI 742/2025·UPC APP 36707/2025·UPC APP 36817/2025
1 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Court of Appeal·2025
- 2026-03-03Application RoP 265Public
Summary: The Court of Appeal permitted Washtower's withdrawal of its application for provisional measures under R. 265 RoP and declared the proceedings closed. Washtower agreed to bear the costs of both first and second instance of the provisional measures proceedings. The Court also determined the value in dispute at 66% of the value of a permanent injunction, in accordance with the Court of Appeal's guidelines on cost ceilings for provisional measure proceedings not followed by a merits action.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Withdrawal of provisional measures application (R. 265 RoP)
- Costs allocation on withdrawal
- Value in dispute for provisional measures proceedings (Cost Guidelines II.5(b))
- 2025-09-24Appeal RoP220.1Public
Summary: Court of Appeal (Judge-Rapporteur) granted Appellants' request for a two-week extension of the time limit for lodging their Statement of Grounds of Appeal, from 26 September 2025 to 10 October 2025, citing the exceptional circumstance that both lead attorney and lead patent attorney were unavailable due to professional constraints including an EPO oral hearing.
Show the legal issues (2)
- Extension of time for Statement of Grounds of Appeal (R. 9.3 RoP)
- Exceptional circumstances
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Case closed | 2026-03-03 | Not public |
| Decision | 2026-03-03 | Not public |
| Final Order | 2026-03-03 | Public |
| Order | 2026-03-03 | Not public |
| Other Documents | 2026-03-03 | Not public |
| Order | 2026-03-03 | Public |
| Oral procedure closed | 2026-03-03 | Not public |
| Communication | 2026-02-20 | Not public |
| Order | 2026-02-20 | Not public |
| Order | 2026-02-20 | Public |