UPClytics
View all cases

no order number559935/2023 - application processed in hardcopy only (outside CMS)

·EP1740740: COMPACT SERVICE MODULE WHICH IS INTENDED FOR ELECTROLYTIC ALUMINIUM PRODUCTION PLANTS

Case details
Status
Action
Damages assessment
Category
Costs Assessments
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Konstantin Schallmoser
Respondents
Reps: Benjamin Schröer
Division
Hamburg LD
Judges
Language
First decided
Jan 25, 2024
Decisions
  • 2024-01-25
    DamagesDetermination of damages and compensation

    The Hamburg Local Division panel rejected Fives ECL's application under Rule 333 RoP to have the full panel review the judge-rapporteur's decision sustaining the defendant's objection (Einspruch), finding the review application inadmissible because that type of decision by the judge-rapporteur granting an objection is not subject to panel review under Rule 333 RoP.

    Legal issues:Rule 333 RoP: admissibility of panel review of judge-rapporteur's decisionObjection under Rule 19 RoP analogy in damages determination proceedingsJurisdiction of UPC for damages determination following national infringement judgment
Documents
  • 2024-01-25%20LD%20Hamburg%20ACT_559935-2023%20-%20application%20processed%20in%20hardcopy%20only%20%28outside%20CMS%29%20anonymized.pdf2024-01-25DE