View all cases
no order number559935/2023 - application processed in hardcopy only (outside CMS)
—·EP1740740: COMPACT SERVICE MODULE WHICH IS INTENDED FOR ELECTROLYTIC ALUMINIUM PRODUCTION PLANTS
- Case details
- Status—ActionDamages assessmentCategoryCosts Assessments
- Parties
- Division
- Hamburg LD
- Judges
- Sabine Klepsch · Presiding judge and Judge-rapporteur
- Stefan Schilling · Legally qualified judge
- Mojca Mlakar · Legally qualified judge
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Jan 25, 2024
Decisions
- 2024-01-25DamagesDetermination of damages and compensation
The Hamburg Local Division panel rejected Fives ECL's application under Rule 333 RoP to have the full panel review the judge-rapporteur's decision sustaining the defendant's objection (Einspruch), finding the review application inadmissible because that type of decision by the judge-rapporteur granting an objection is not subject to panel review under Rule 333 RoP.
Legal issues:Rule 333 RoP: admissibility of panel review of judge-rapporteur's decisionObjection under Rule 19 RoP analogy in damages determination proceedingsJurisdiction of UPC for damages determination following national infringement judgment
Documents
- 2024-01-25%20LD%20Hamburg%20ACT_559935-2023%20-%20application%20processed%20in%20hardcopy%20only%20%28outside%20CMS%29%20anonymized.pdf2024-01-25DE