ENDE

Account

Analytics 1Cases 1Decisions 4Judges 3Parties 2Firms

Filters

Case number

Patent number

Filing date

→

Decision date

→

Division

Language

Category

Subcategory

Substantive (main) cases only

Proceeding type

Action type

Status

Outcome

Outcome detail

Motion type

Settlement timing

Technology (L1)

Technology sector

CPC code

SEP / FRAND

Judge

Claimant

Respondent

Firm

Corporate group

Entity type

Has security order

Security status

Legal principle

costs follow the event per Art. 69(1) UPCA; split where each party succeeds on part

Cites UPC case

Cites authority

Had oral hearing

Filters

Case number

Patent number

Filing date

→

Decision date

→

Division

Language

Category

Subcategory

Substantive (main) cases only

Proceeding type

Action type

Status

Outcome

Outcome detail

Motion type

Settlement timing

Technology (L1)

Technology sector

CPC code

SEP / FRAND

Judge

Claimant

Respondent

Firm

Corporate group

Entity type

Has security order

Security status

Legal principle

costs follow the event per Art. 69(1) UPCA; split where each party succeeds on part

Cites UPC case

Cites authority

Had oral hearing

Firm scorecards

Activity, side mix, division specialization, top clients.

Legal principlecosts follow the event per Art. 69(1) UPCA; split where each party succeeds on part Clear all

Wildanger Kehrwald Graf. v. Schwerin & Partner mbB, Düsseldorf

2 attorneys · 2 historical cases (full data)

Clear and return to cohort view

Total cases

1

Claimant-side

1

Respondent-side

0

Attorneys

2

Attorney roster

Names extracted from decision PDFs.

Eva Geschke
Jan-Caspar Maiers

Top divisions

Dusseldorf LD1

Top clients

Tridonic GmbH & Co KG1

Recent cases

—ACT_590302/2023Dusseldorf LDNot infringedTridonic GmbH & Co KG v CUPOWER Shenzhen Xiezhen Electronics Co., Ltd