UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics22Cases15Decisions23Judges22Parties11Firms

Judge intelligence

Ruling tendencies, PI grant rate, time-to-decision per judge. French-seated divisions are anonymized at the individual level.

Uwe Schwengelbeck

Court of Appeal · Milan CD · Milan LD · Munich LD · Paris CD · Vienna LD

Clear and return to cohort view
Total cases
41
PI grant rate
0%
Infringement rate
100%
Median time-to-decision (days)
76
Roles
technically_qualified
Outcome breakdown
  • Pending14
  • Procedural only12
  • Costs only5
  • Infringed5
  • PI denied3
  • Injunction denied1
  • Dismissed1
Roles
  • Technically Qualified Judge
  • Technically qualified judge
Recent cases
Latest filings where this judge sat on the panel.
  • —UPC_APP_40442/2024Procedural onlyA. Menarini Diagnostics s.r.l. v Insulet Corporation
  • —APL_68523/2024Costs onlyKoninklijke Philips N.V. v Belkin Limited
  • —ACT_40442/2024PI deniedInsulet Corporation v A. Menarini Diagnostics s.r.l.
  • —UPC_APP_53031/2024Injunction deniedKoninklijke Philips N.V. v Belkin Limited
  • —UPC_APP_50666/2024Procedural onlyInsulet Corporation v EOFLOW Co., Ltd.
  • —CC_65201/2024InfringedInsulet Corporation v EOFLOW Co., Ltd.
  • —ORD_22456/2025InfringedInsulet Corporation v EOFLOW Co., Ltd.
  • —ORD_52068/2024Procedural onlyInsulet Corporation v EOFLOW Co., Ltd.
  • —ACT_56003/2024InfringedInsulet Corporation v EOFLOW Co., Ltd.
  • 2026-02-10UPC_CoA_20/2026— v
  • 2025-10-14UPC_CFI_1167/2025Procedural onlyInsulet Corporation v EOFLOW Co., Ltd.
  • 2025-08-21UPC_CFI_773/2025—Insulet Corporation v EOFLOW Co., Ltd.
  • 2025-08-21UPC_CFI_774/2025Costs onlyInsulet Corporation v EOFLOW Co., Ltd.
  • 2025-07-02UPC_CFI_603/2025—Koninklijke Philips N.V. v Belkin International, Inc.
  • 2025-06-23UPC_APP_29763/2025—Shenzhen Dianming Technology Co., Ltd v SWARCO FUTURIT Verkehrssignalsysteme Ges.m.b.H.
  • 2025-05-28UPC_CFI_477/2025Procedural onlyInsulet Corporation v EOFLOW Co., Ltd.
  • 2025-05-16UPC_APP_23569/2025Procedural onlyShenzhen Dianming Technology Co., Ltd v SWARCO FUTURIT Verkehrssignalsysteme Ges.m.b.H.
  • 2025-05-14UPC_CFI_425/2025—Name not displayed for GDPR reasons. Represented by Christopher MAIERHÖFER v Swarco Futurit Verkehrssignalsysteme Ges. m. b. H.
  • 2025-04-10UPC_APP_17662/2025—Yunex GmbH v SWARCO FUTURIT Verkehrssignalsysteme Ges.m.b.H.
  • 2025-03-20UPC_CFI_245/2025—SWARCO FUTURIT Verkehrssignalsysteme Ges.m.b.H. v Yunex GmbH
  • 2025-02-25UPC_CFI_84/2025—SES-imagotag v Hanshow Germany GmbH
  • 2025-01-10UPC_CoA_19/2025Procedural onlyKoninklijke Philips N.V. v Belkin GmbH
  • 2025-01-02UPC_CoA_845/2024Procedural onlyKoninklijke Philips N.V. v Belkin GmbH
  • 2024-12-23UPC_APP_67784/2024—A. Menarini Diagnostics s.r.l. v Insulet Corporation
  • 2024-12-12UPC_APP_65673/2024Costs onlyEOFLOW Co., Ltd. v Insulet Corporation