UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases1Decisions4Judges5Parties2Firms

Judge intelligence

Ruling tendencies, PI grant rate, time-to-decision per judge. French-seated divisions are anonymized at the individual level.

Legal principlerevocation of patent claim as counterclaim defeats infringement actionClear all

Peter Juul Agergaard

Copenhagen LD · Dusseldorf LD · Hamburg LD

Clear and return to cohort view
Total cases
7
PI grant rate
—
Infringement rate
—
Median time-to-decision (days)
—
Roles
legally_qualified, rapporteur
Outcome breakdown
  • Procedural only3
  • Settled3
  • Revoked1
Roles
  • Judge-rapporteur
  • Legally qualified judge
Recent cases
Latest filings where this judge sat on the panel.
  • —UPC_APP_15203/2025Procedural onlyLionra Technologies Ltd. v Cisco Systems GmbH
  • —ACT_3932/2024RevokedHeadwater Research LLC v Samsung Electronics GmbH
  • —UPC_APP_20487/2025SettledEvac Oy v Shanghai VacDrain Vacuum Drainage Equipment Co., Ltd.
  • —UPC_APP_6997/2024SettledN.V. Nutricia v Nestlé Health Science (Deutschland) GmbH
  • —UPC_APP_24791/2025SettledVersah LLC v HaeNaem Co., Ltd.
  • —ACT_47484/2024Procedural onlyHybridgenerator ApS v HGSystem ApS
  • —ACT_30657/2025Procedural onlyTridonic GmbH & Co KG v Inventronics GmbH