UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases1Decisions4Judges3Parties1Firms

Judge intelligence

Ruling tendencies, PI grant rate, time-to-decision per judge. French-seated divisions are anonymized at the individual level.

Legal principlesummary validity assessment at pi stage limited to best three invalidity argumentsClear all

Schober

Dusseldorf LD · Mannheim LD · Munich LD

Clear and return to cohort view
Total cases
7
PI grant rate
100%
Infringement rate
0%
Median time-to-decision (days)
—
Roles
legally_qualified, technically_qualified
Outcome breakdown
  • Procedural only5
  • PI granted1
  • Not infringed1
Roles
  • Legally Qualified Judge
  • Legally qualified judge
  • Technically Qualified Judge
  • Technically qualified judge
Recent cases
Latest filings where this judge sat on the panel.
  • —ACT_589207/2023PI grantedDyson Technology Limited v SharkNinja Europe Limited
  • —ACT_14438/2025Procedural onlyOTEC Präzisionsfinish GmbH v STEROS GPA INNOVATIVE S.L.
  • —UPC_CFI_1589/2025Procedural onlyKomax Holding AG v Jiangsu BOZHIWANG Automation Equipment Co., Ltd.
  • —ORD_18121/2024Procedural onlyOrtovox Sportartikel GmbH v Mammut Sports Group AG
  • —ACT_590302/2023Not infringedTridonic GmbH & Co KG v CUPOWER Shenzhen Xiezhen Electronics Co., Ltd
  • —UPC_APP_40530/2024Procedural onlyDISH Technologies L.L.C. v AYLO PREMIUM LTD
  • —UPC_APP_13218/2025Procedural onlyTridonic GmbH & Co KG v CUPOWER Shenzhen Xiezhen Electronics Co., Ltd