ENDE

Account

Analytics 1Cases 1Decisions 4Judges 3Parties 1Firms

Filters

Case number

Patent number

Filing date

→

Decision date

→

Division

Language

Category

Subcategory

Substantive (main) cases only

Proceeding type

Action type

Status

Outcome

Outcome detail

Motion type

Settlement timing

Technology (L1)

Technology sector

CPC code

SEP / FRAND

Judge

Weber

Claimant

Respondent

Firm

Corporate group

Entity type

Has security order

Security status

Legal principle

summary validity assessment at pi stage limited to best three invalidity arguments

Cites UPC case

Cites authority

Had oral hearing

Filters

Case number

Patent number

Filing date

→

Decision date

→

Division

Language

Category

Subcategory

Substantive (main) cases only

Proceeding type

Action type

Status

Outcome

Outcome detail

Motion type

Settlement timing

Technology (L1)

Technology sector

CPC code

SEP / FRAND

Judge

Weber

Claimant

Respondent

Firm

Corporate group

Entity type

Has security order

Security status

Legal principle

summary validity assessment at pi stage limited to best three invalidity arguments

Cites UPC case

Cites authority

Had oral hearing

Judge intelligence

Ruling tendencies, PI grant rate, time-to-decision per judge. French-seated divisions are anonymized at the individual level.

Legal principlesummary validity assessment at pi stage limited to best three invalidity arguments Clear all

Weber

Munich LD

Clear and return to cohort view

Total cases

1

PI grant rate

100%

Infringement rate

—

Median time-to-decision (days)

—

Roles

technically_qualified

Outcome breakdown

PI granted1

Roles

Technically Qualified Judge

Recent cases

Latest filings where this judge sat on the panel.

—ACT_589207/2023Munich LDPI grantedDyson Technology Limited v SharkNinja Europe Limited