UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases1Decisions4Judges3Parties2Firms

Judge intelligence

Ruling tendencies, PI grant rate, time-to-decision per judge. French-seated divisions are anonymized at the individual level.

Legal principlecosts gap in absence of main proceedings addressed by analogy to R. 118.5 RoP or R. 213.2 RoPClear all

Zana

Dusseldorf LD · Mannheim LD

Clear and return to cohort view
Total cases
3
PI grant rate
0%
Infringement rate
—
Median time-to-decision (days)
—
Roles
legally_qualified
Outcome breakdown
  • Procedural only2
  • PI denied1
Roles
  • Legally Qualified Judge
  • Legally qualified judge
Recent cases
Latest filings where this judge sat on the panel.
  • —UPC_APP_18490/2025Procedural onlyTOTAL SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC v Texas Instruments Incorporation
  • —UPC_APP_20197/2025Procedural onlyTOTAL SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC v Texas Instruments Incorporation
  • —ACT_18551/2024PI deniedNovartis AG v Celltrion Inc.