ENDE

Account

Analytics 1Cases 1Decisions 0Judges 3Parties 1Firms

Filters

Case number

Patent number

Filing date

→

Decision date

→

Division

Language

Category

Subcategory

Substantive (main) cases only

Proceeding type

Action type

Status

Outcome

Outcome detail

Motion type

Settlement timing

Technology (L1)

Technology sector

CPC code

SEP / FRAND

Judge

Claimant

Respondent

Firm

Corporate group

Entity type

Has security order

Security status

Legal principle

court-ordered recall letter and website publication under art. 64 upca

Cites UPC case

Cites authority

Had oral hearing

Filters

Case number

Patent number

Filing date

→

Decision date

→

Division

Language

Category

Subcategory

Substantive (main) cases only

Proceeding type

Action type

Status

Outcome

Outcome detail

Motion type

Settlement timing

Technology (L1)

Technology sector

CPC code

SEP / FRAND

Judge

Claimant

Respondent

Firm

Corporate group

Entity type

Has security order

Security status

Legal principle

court-ordered recall letter and website publication under art. 64 upca

Cites UPC case

Cites authority

Had oral hearing

Parties

Filing frequency, side mix, win records, firms typically retained — by corporate group or standalone party.

Show:

Categoryinfringement Legal principlecourt-ordered recall letter and website publication under art. 64 upca Clear all

Top corporate groups

Combined filings across grouped entities.

Group	Total cases	Claimant-side	Respondent-side

Top standalone parties

Parties not yet rolled into a corporate group.

Party	Total cases	Claimant-side	Respondent-side
Plant-e Knowledge B.V.Operating company	1	1	0
Plant-e B.V.	1	1	0
Arkyne Technologies S.L.	1	0	1