Cross-case analytics for the UPC

Where to file, by the numbers.

Plate I · Forum Strategylive · 13 divisions
The same case, different odds.
Patentee outcomes ranked by division — what the CMS won't tell you.
Division
Cases
PI grant
Median time
Outcomes (upheld / partial / revoked)
München
MUC · LOCAL DIV.
412
64%
11.2mo
58%28%14%
Düsseldorf
DUS · LOCAL DIV.
287
51%
10.4mo
54%28%18%
Mannheim
MHM · LOCAL DIV.
244
47%
11.7mo
56%26%18%
Paris
PAR · LOCAL DIV.
198
38%
13.8mo
49%30%21%
Fig. 1 — Slicable by tech sector, party type, case category in-product. Upheld Partial Revoked
13
UPC divisions, all covered
2,692
Cases indexed
1,798
Decisions structured
< 1h
From filing to indexed
§ II
What you'll do with it.

Six cross-case questions, answered with data.

The Case Management System gives you decisions as PDFs but does not tell you who won. We classify outcomes — infringed, revoked, granted, dismissed — so the questions worth paying for become queryable.

I.

Where should I file?

PI grant rate by division, average time-to-decision, patentee-friendliness — by the numbers, not by gut feel.

Forum strategy
II.

What does drawing this judge mean?

Ruling tendencies, PI grant rate, history with similar parties. Word-of-mouth made queryable.

Judge intelligence
III.

What kind of opponent is this company?

Filing frequency, settle-vs-litigate ratio, win record, firms they retain, patents they assert.

Adversary profiling
IV.

Who's good at this kind of case?

Activity by firm, specialization, win records, recurring pairings. For GCs picking outside counsel.

Firm scorecards
V.

What's normal for this case?

Historical PI grant rate, revocation rate, infringement-finding rate. Settlements priced on data.

Outcome base rates
VI.

Tell me when something matters.

Push alerts when a competitor is sued, a portfolio patent is challenged, or a precedent lands.

Monitoring · soon
§ III
Built for.

Litigators, in-house teams, and underwriters.

Litigators

Pick the right division. Read the right judge. Quote the right base rate in mediation. Build forum-shopping memos with citations, not anecdotes.

General counsel & in-house IP

Benchmark outside counsel by win record. Track adversaries before they file. Forecast settlement value with the actual UPC base rate, not consultants' guesses.

Underwriters & bond providers

Security-for-costs deposits, grant rates, forfeiture rates by division. Sized for ValeIP, Burford, Omni Bridgeway, and the litigation-finance market.

See the underwriter view
§ IV
How it works.

From the public registers to a memo-ready dossier — in four steps.

STEP 01
Sync

Every public UPC decision pulled from the Case Management System the moment it lands.

STEP 02
Index

Parties, judges, firms, and patents resolved across languages and divisions.

STEP 03
Classify

Outcomes extracted: infringed, revoked, granted, dismissed, settled.

STEP 04
Surface

Cross-case dashboards, dossiers, and monitoring — citation-ready, export-ready.

§ V
Pricing.

Two ways to begin. Both without commitment.

Free trial
14 days, full access

Everything we have, no credit card. Bring your own matter, or browse the corpus.

  • All 13 UPC divisions
  • Up to 3 seats
  • Daily data refresh
  • Export to PDF & DOCX
Firm
For practice groups & in-house teams

Tailored access for litigation departments, IP groups, and underwriting desks.

  • Unlimited seats & matters
  • SSO, audit logs, DPA
  • Custom alerting & API
  • Dedicated success contact
§ VI
Methodology.

Built on the public record. Verifiable, auditable, citation-ready.

Sources

UPC Case Management System, EPO register, national IP offices across the 17 contracting member states.

Refresh

Public-record sources polled continuously; new filings indexed within the hour.

Compliance

GDPR · French-judge anonymization · EU-hosted infrastructure · DPA on request.

§ VII
Questions, answered.

Is UPClytics limited to the Unified Patent Court?

Yes. The UPC is pan-European, multilingual, three years old, and underserved by legacy patent-litigation tools. Adjacent EPO and national-office data is referenced where it sharpens a UPC question.

Where does your data come from?

The Unified Patent Court's Case Management System (unifiedpatentcourt.org), supplemented by the EPO register and national patent offices. Everything we surface is on the public record.

How quickly is a new filing reflected?

New filings are indexed within an hour of appearing on the CMS. Decisions are extracted, classified, and surfaced the same day.

Do you support German, French, Italian, Dutch?

Yes — decisions are processed natively in their issued language, then normalized into structured outcomes a non-native reader can use.

Where is the platform hosted?

EU-hosted infrastructure. Data and identity stay inside the European Economic Area. DPA available on request.

— Begin —

See your matter in UPClytics.

Fourteen days of full access. No card, no commitment.