UPC Analytics
DEEN
Analysen8Fälle6Entscheidungen10Richter17Parteien3Kanzleien
EingangstrendsAusgängeVerfahrensdauerTechnologieForumstrategieLeitentscheidungenRechtsfragenSicherheitsleistung

Rechtsfragen

Querschnittsansicht der Rechtsgrundsätze, wiederkehrender Argumente und des Stands der Technik, auf den sich das Gericht stützt.

Kategorieprovisional_measuresAlle zurücksetzen
Meistdiskutierte Rechtsgrundsätze
Wiederkehrende Rechtsgrundsätze über 1 Fälle mit extrahierter Begründung. Die Erfolgsquote zählt patenthalterfreundliche Ausgänge.
GrundsatzFälleEntschiedenPatenthalter-Erfolg
patent amendment auxiliary requests (r. 30.2 rop) are inadmissible in provisional measures proceedings110%
in provisional measures: cumulative requirements of standing, validity, infringement or imminent infringement, and balance of interests must all be met110%
rule 263.2 rop 'amend its case' refers to modification of the case by new claim or substitution, not to patent amendment applications110%
security for costs requires substantiated evidence of insolvency risk or lack of sufficient assets — non-eu incorporation alone insufficient110%
confirmation of settlement as enforceable final decision under art. 79 upca110%
court-facilitated settlement under case management powers (r. 332 rop)110%
publication of redacted settlement only under r. 365 rop110%
court fee reimbursement on settlement not automatic110%
ex parte provisional measures available where prior notification would defeat the purpose of the relief (r. 206.3(a) rop)11100%
trade fair context creates special urgency justifying ex parte approach11100%
security must be provided by applicant as condition of enforceability (art. 60.5 upca)11100%
merits proceedings must be commenced within 31 calendar days or 20 working days or the order is revocable on respondent's request11100%
ex parte seizure order at trade fair justified by time-critical urgency11100%
pirelli's global market standing supports financial ability to compensate respondents if measures are wrongly granted (proportionality)11100%
merits proceedings must be initiated within 31 calendar days or 20 working days of service or order lapses11100%
Häufigste zurückgewiesene Argumente
Argumente, die das UPC nicht akzeptiert hat, sortiert nach wiederholten Auftritten in Fällen.
ArgumentParteiFälle
application for provisional measures for infringement of ep 4 201 327 relating to insulin pump technologyKläger1
security for costs in the amount of eur 200,000 due to risk of inability to enforce cost judgment against a us companyBeklagter1
60% reimbursement of court fees (eur 6,600) requested by edwards under r. 370.9(c) and 370.11 ropKläger1
Meistzitierter Stand der Technik
Über substanzielle Hauptsachefälle herangezogene Schriften und ihre typische Rolle.
SchriftreferenzVorherrschende RolleFälle
US 994Erfindungsmüh-Kombination1