ACT 6395/2025
—·EP2661892: MOTION PREDICTION IN VIDEO CODING
- Verfahrensdetails
- Status—VerfahrensartKostenfestsetzungKategorieKostenfestsetzungen
- Parteien
- BeklagteVertreter: Andreas Oser (Prüfer & Partner mbB Patentanwälte Rechtsanwälte); Peter Kleim (Prüfer & Partner mbB Patentanwälte Rechtsanwälte)
- Division
- Paris CD
- Richter
- Maximilian Haedicke · Legally qualified judge, judge-rapporteur
- Technology
- Telecommunications
- Sprache
- —
- Erste Entscheidung
- 27. Juli 2025
- 2025-07-27Nur KostenKostenApplication For Costs
Central Division Paris issued a costs decision in Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. v. Photon Wave Co., Ltd. following a preliminary objection in a revocation action. The court held: (1) a separate cost decision under R. 150 RoP is admissible after a preliminary objection that closes the proceedings before that division (jurisdiction declined and case transferred to Paris Local Division); (2) value of the revocation action set at EUR 500,000; (3) value of the preliminary objection proceedings set at one-quarter of the revocation action value (EUR 125,000); (4) expert costs for an opinion on Art. 33(4) UPCA interpretation were not reimbursable. Photon Wave bears 80% of Seoul Viosys's recoverable costs for the preliminary objection.
Rechtsfragen:Admissibility of separate cost decision following preliminary objection (R. 150 RoP)Value of preliminary objection proceedings vs. full actionReimbursability of expert costs (Art. 69 UPCA)
- B8A7CF6E22F806F04CCDB7A669A87BE7_en.pdf2025-07-27ENGLISH