UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

APL 24585/2024

·EP2642632: Wireless power receiver and method of manufacturing the same

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Verfahrensart
Berufung
Kategorie
Hauptberufung
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter: Thomas Adam (Peterreins Schley)
Division
Court of Appeal
Richter
Technology
Automotive
Sprache
Erste Entscheidung
6. Aug. 2024
Entscheidungen
  • 2024-08-06
    AbgewiesenBerufungsentscheidungAppeal RoP220.2

    Court of Appeal upheld Hamburg Local Division's refusal to allow service of a statement of claim on Chinese Xiaomi entities (Xiaomi Communications Co. Ltd. and Xiaomi Inc.) via their German/Dutch group companies in Nera Innovations Ltd. v. Xiaomi entities (EP 2 642 632). The court held: (1) service on a Chinese-domiciled defendant cannot be made via a group company in a contracting member state without more, because the corporate separation principle applies; (2) service must first be attempted via the Hague Service Convention (R. 274.1(a)(ii) RoP); (3) alternative service (R. 274.1(b), R. 275 RoP) is available only after Hague Convention attempts.

    Rechtsfragen:Service of statement of claim on defendants in China (R. 273, 274 RoP)Hague Service Convention requirement before alternative serviceCorporate separation principle preventing service via group company
Dokumente
  • BCB47F5E17A08FBDC11D315DF6887880_de.pdf2024-08-06GERMAN