Alle Fälle anzeigen
APL 31428/2024
—
- Verfahrensdetails
- Status—VerfahrensartBerufungKategorieHauptberufung
- Parteien
- KlägerVertreter: Stefan Golkowsky (Patentanwälte Pfennig, Meinig und Partner mbB); Yori Manzke (Patentanwälte Pfennig, Meinig und Partner mbB); Maxi Rafaela Thrum (Patentanwälte Pfennig, Meinig und Partner mbB); Johannes Bukow (Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP); Anna-Katharina Hübler (Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP)Beklagte—
- Division
- Court of Appeal
- Richter
- —
- Sprache
- —
- Erste Entscheidung
- 26. März 2025
Entscheidungen
- 2025-03-26Nur KostenBerufungsentscheidungAppeal RoP220.1
The Court of Appeal issued an order on costs distribution after a patent revocation action became moot because the patent holder surrendered the patent; the Court established that an exception to the loser-pays rule applies where the patent owner surrendered immediately at the outset of proceedings without prior provocation.
Rechtsfragen:Costs distribution after patent surrender (R. 360 RoP)Exception to loser-pays rule (Art. 69(1) UPCA)Patent surrender (Art. 105a EPC)
Dokumente
- 29CAEB74227BAE3225932329D70FA838_de.pdf2025-03-26DE