Alle Fälle anzeigen
APL 596007/2023
—·EP3295663: DIGITALLY OVERLAYING AN IMAGE WITH ANOTHER IMAGE
- Verfahrensdetails
- Status—VerfahrensartBerufungKategorieHauptberufung
- Parteien
- KlägerVertreter: Johanna Flythström (Roschier); Mikael Segercrantz (Roschier); Ari Laakkonen (Powell Gilbert (Europe) LLP); Siddharth Kusumakar (Powell Gilbert (Europe) LLP); Ralph Nack (Noerr Partnerschaftsgesellschaft mbB); Niclas Gajeck (Noerr Partnerschaftsgesellschaft mbB); Maximilian von Rospatt (rospatt osten pross)BeklagteVertreter: Henrik Lehment (Hogan Lovells International LLP); Matthias Sonntag (Gleiss Lutz); Panu Siitonen (Hannes Snellman)
- Division
- Court of Appeal
- Richter
- Rian Kalden · Presiding judge and judge-rapporteur
- Ingeborg Simonsson · Legally qualified judge
- Patricia Rombach · Legally qualified judge
- Technology
- Computing & AI
- Sprache
- —
- Erste Entscheidung
- 12. Nov. 2024
Entscheidungen
- 2024-11-12BerufungsentscheidungAppeal RoP220.1
The Court of Appeal ruled on the interpretation of the term 'action' in Article 83 UPCA regarding jurisdiction and withdrawal of opt-outs during the transitional period. The Court held that the sentence concerning national court actions in Art. 83(4) UPCA refers only to actions brought during the transitional regime.
Rechtsfragen:Jurisdiction of the UPCWithdrawal of opt-outInterpretation of Art. 83 UPCATransitional regime
Dokumente
- 12B21CBC1FBCB93A97568A538CAA390D_en.pdf2024-11-12EN