APL 64374/2024

—·EP4201327: FLUID DELIVERY DEVICE WITH TRANSCUTANEOUS ACCESS TOOL, INSERTION MECHANISM AND BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING FOR USE THEREWITH

Verfahrensdetails: Status
—
Verfahrensart
Berufung
Kategorie
Hauptberufung
Parteien: Kläger
Insulet Corporation
Vertreter: Frank Peterreins (Peterreins Schley)
Beklagte
EOFLOW Co., Ltd.
Vertreter: Mirko Weinert (Hoyng Rokh Monegier)
Division: Court of Appeal
Richter: Rian Kalden · Presiding Judge
Ingeborg Simonsson · Legally Qualified Judge
Patricia Rombach · Legally Qualified Judge and Judge-Rapporteur
Steven Kitchen · Technically Qualified Judge
Udo Matter · Technically Qualified Judge
Technology: Packaging & Conveying
Sprache: —
Erste Entscheidung: 1. Mai 2025

Entscheidungen

2025-05-01
PI erteiltBerufungsentscheidungAppeal RoP220.1
The Court of Appeal set aside the Milan Central Division's refusal of provisional measures and granted Insulet a pan-European preliminary injunction against EOFlow's insulin pump device ('EOPatch'/'GlucoMen Day Pump'), finding infringement of EP 4 201 327 and awarding costs to Insulet.
Rechtsfragen:Provisional measures (Art. 62 UPCA)Claim construction by court vs. expertPerson skilled in the artRisk of continuation of infringementCost apportionment where party succeeds only in part

Dokumente