APL 8/2024

—·EP3883277: METHOD FOR COMMUNICATING SPATIALLY LOCATED INFORMATION TO A MOBILE TERMINAL

Verfahrensdetails: Status
—
Verfahrensart
Berufung
Kategorie
Hauptberufung
Parteien: Kläger
VusionGroup SA (formerly SES-imagotag SA)
Vertreter: Jochen Herr (Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP); Alexandre Hoffmann (Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP); Daniel Seitz (Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP)
Beklagte
Hanshow Technology Co. Ltd
Hanshow Germany GmbH
Hanshow France SAS
Hanshow Netherlands B.V.
Vertreter: Roland Küppers (Taylor Wessing); Alexander Rubusch (Taylor Wessing)
Division: Court of Appeal
Richter: Klaus Grabinski · President of the Court of Appeal
Françoise Barutel · Legally Qualified Judge
Peter Blok · Legally Qualified Judge / Judge-Rapporteur
Eric Augarde · Technically Qualified Judge
Klaus Loibner · Technically Qualified Judge
Technology: Computing & AI
Sprache: —
Erste Entscheidung: 13. Mai 2024

Entscheidungen

2024-05-13
PI abgelehntBerufungsentscheidungAppeal RoP220.1
Order by the Court of Appeal (UPC_CoA_1/2024, 13 May 2024) dismissing VusionGroup SA's (formerly SES-imagotag) appeal against the first-instance refusal of a preliminary injunction based on unitary patent EP 3 883 277 (electronic shelf labels). The CoA found that Hanshow's products do not fall within claim 1 because the antenna is not positioned further towards the front face than the circuit board as required; VusionGroup was ordered to bear costs.
Rechtsfragen:Preliminary injunction (provisional measures)Claim interpretation: antenna positioning featureNon-infringementElectronic shelf label patent

Dokumente