ORD 10103/2024

—·EP3295663: DIGITALLY OVERLAYING AN IMAGE WITH ANOTHER IMAGE

Verfahrensdetails: Status
—
Verfahrensart
Verfahrensantrag
Kategorie
Verfahrensführungsanordnungen
Parteien: Kläger
AIM Sport Development AG
Vertreter: Johanna Flythström (Roschier); Mikael Segercrantz (Roschier); Ari Laakkonen (Powell Gilbert (Europe) LLP); Ralph Nack (Noerr Partnerschaftsgesellschaft mbB); Maximilian von Rospatt (rospatt osten pross)
Beklagte
Supponor Oy
Supponor Limited
Supponor SASU
Supponor Italia SRL
Supponor España SL
Vertreter: Henrik Lehment (Hogan Lovells International LLP); Matthias Sonntag (Gleiss Lutz); Panu Siitonen (Hannes Schnell Attorneys)
Division: Court of Appeal
Richter: Rian Kalden · Presiding judge and judge-rapporteur
Technology: Computing & AI
Sprache: —
Erste Entscheidung: 26. Feb. 2024

Entscheidungen

2024-02-26
BerufungsentscheidungGeneric Order
The Court of Appeal ruled that AIM Sport's appeal (lodged as APL_596892/2023) against a first-instance decision dismissing the actions due to patent opt-out was filed out of the two-month time limit under R.220.1(c) RoP and was therefore inadmissible.
Rechtsfragen:Admissibility of appeal – time limit (R.220.1(c) RoP)Opt-out of European patentUPC competence

Dokumente