ORD 40822/2024

—·EP3594009: LITHOGRAPHIC PRINTING PLATE ORIGINAL PLATE, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING LITHOGRAPHIC PRINTING PLATE

Verfahrensdetails: Status
—
Verfahrensart
Verfahrensantrag
Kategorie
Verfahrensführungsanordnungen
Parteien: Kläger
Fujifilm Corporation
Vertreter: Lars Baum (Hoyng Rokh Monegier)
Beklagte
Kodak GmbH
Kodak Graphic Communications GmbH
Kodak Holding GmbH
Vertreter: Eva Acker (Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer)
Division: Dusseldorf LD
Richter: —
Sprache: —
Erste Entscheidung: 2. Aug. 2024

Entscheidungen

2024-08-02
Generic Order
The Düsseldorf Local Division issued a procedural order addressing the scope of applications to amend the patent under R. 30 RoP and R. 263 RoP. The court clarified that amendments to auxiliary requests in an application to amend the patent are subject to R. 30.2 RoP (requiring court permission), and that territorial limitation of an amendment application should only be made if there are objective reasons for it under Art. 34 UPCA.
Rechtsfragen:Admissibility of amended application to amend patent (R. 30.2 RoP)Territorial limitation of patent amendment application (Art. 34 UPCA)R. 263 RoP scope and amendments to auxiliary requests

Dokumente