ORD 8874/2025

—·EP3883277: METHOD FOR COMMUNICATING SPATIALLY LOCATED INFORMATION TO A MOBILE TERMINAL

Verfahrensdetails: Status
—
Verfahrensart
Verfahrensantrag
Kategorie
Verfahrensführungsanordnungen
Parteien: Kläger
VusionGroup SA
Vertreter: Anton Horn (Heuking)
Beklagte
Hanshow Technology Co. Ltd
Hanshow Germany GmbH
Hanshow France SAS
Hanshow Netherlands B.V.
Vertreter: Roland Küppers (Taylor Wessing)
Division: Court of Appeal
Richter: Ingeborg Simonsson · Standing judge
Technology: Computing & AI
Sprache: —
Erste Entscheidung: 21. Feb. 2025

Entscheidungen

2025-02-21
Generic Order
The Court of Appeal (Standing Judge Ingeborg Simonsson) ruled on admissibility issues in Hanshow's appeal against the Munich Local Division's cost decision in VusionGroup's provisional measures proceedings (EP 3 883 277). The Court held that: (1) cost applications constitute summary proceedings; (2) R. 221 RoP does not always require a separate Statement of Appeal after leave to appeal; an application for leave to appeal that sets out the reasons and arguments may serve as both; (3) the Application for Leave treated as the Statement of Appeal was admissible. The Court addressed the substance of the appeal on this basis.
Rechtsfragen:Admissibility of appeal against cost decision (R. 221 RoP)Statement of appeal and statement of grounds in cost decision appealsSummary nature of cost proceedings

Dokumente