Alle Fälle anzeigen
UPC APP 23407/2025
—·EP2028981: JUICE EXTRACTOR
- Verfahrensdetails
- Status—VerfahrensartVerfahrensantragKategorieVerfahrensführungsanordnungen
- Parteien
- KlägerVertreter: Klaus Haft (Hoyng Rokh Monegier); Sebastian Kratzer (Hoyng Rokh Monegier)BeklagteVertreter: Martin Momtschilow (Preu Bohlig & Partner); Christian Kau (Preu Bohlig & Partner); Axel Oldekop (Preu Bohlig & Partner)
- Division
- Court of Appeal
- Richter
- Klaus Grabinski · President of Court of Appeal
- Peter Blok · Legally Qualified Judge
- Emmanuel Gougé · Judge-Rapporteur
- Technology
- Furniture & Household
- Sprache
- —
- Erste Entscheidung
- 6. Juni 2025
Entscheidungen
- 2025-06-06Application Rop 223
Procedural order from the Court of Appeal (UPC_CoA_434/2025) denying NUC Electronics' application for suspensive effect of its appeal against the Mannheim Local Division's infringement judgment (UPC_CFI_162/2024) concerning EP 2 028 981 in favour of Hurom. NUC was required to disclose information about its customers and distribution channels; it argued for suspension pending appeal. The Court held that information disclosure orders should only be suspended in exceptional circumstances, and NUC had not shown its appeal would become devoid of purpose without suspensive effect.
Rechtsfragen:Suspensive effect of appeal (R. 223 RoP, Art. 74 UPCA)Information disclosure orders (Art. 67 UPCA)Enforcement Directive 2004/48/ECBalance of interests
Dokumente
- 9E2A43B68455C195586E97260E099AEC_en.pdf2025-06-06EN