UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC APP 25317/2025

·EP2643717: COLOR-MIXING CONVERGENT OPTICAL SYSTEM

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Verfahrensart
Verfahrensantrag
Kategorie
Sonstige prozessuale
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter: Alexander Koller (NOMOS Rechtsanwälte GmbH)
Beklagte
Vertreter: Rainer Beetz (SONN Patentanwälte); Katharina Pehle (Bird & Bird LLP)
Division
Court of Appeal
Richter
Technology
Display & Signage
Sprache
Erste Entscheidung
1. Aug. 2025
Entscheidungen
  • 2025-08-01
    Generic application

    Court of Appeal (Second Panel) ruled on Strabag's and Chainzone's applications for confidentiality orders under R. 262A RoP in their appeal of the Swarco v. Strabag infringement decision from Vienna Local Division. The Court partly granted and partly rejected the applications, confirming that product characteristics not readily accessible to third parties constitute trade secrets, but rejected applications for information already submitted at first instance without a timely R. 262A request.

    Rechtsfragen:Confidentiality orders (R. 262A RoP)Trade secrets (Art. 58 UPCA)Late applications for confidentiality on appealR. 262.2 RoP vs R. 262A RoP
Dokumente
  • Strabag%2C%20Chainzone%20v%20Swarco%20Anordnung%20GeheimhaltungEN_final.pdf2025-08-01GERMAN
SWARCO FUTURIT Verkehrssignalsysteme GmbH v STRABAG Infrastructure & Safety Solutions… — UPC APP 25317/2025 | UPClytics