UPC_APP_32598/2025

COMPUTERIZED REFRACTION AND ASTIGMATISM DETERMINATION

Prozessuale & UnteranträgeRücknahmeanträgeCourt of AppealApplication Rop 265—Vergleich erfolgt: Vor Hauptsache

Übersicht Entscheidungen Zitate Dokumente Zeitverlauf

Parteien

Kläger

Visibly Inc.

Vertreter: Marc Grunwald (Peterreins Schley, Munich)

Beklagte

Easee B.V.
Easee Holding B.V.

Vertreter: Wim Maas (Taylor Wessing N.V., Eindhoven)

Richter

Rian KaldenPresiding Judge
Patricia RombachLegally Qualified Judge and Rapporteur
Ingeborg SimonssonLegally Qualified Judge

Patente

EP 3918974

CPC-Codes: A61B3/036, A61B3/024, A61B3/0033, A61B3/1035, G02C7/02, A61B3/18, A61B3/0025, A61B3/111, A61B3/0058, A61B3/0325, A61B3/107, A61B3/0041…

Sektor: Pharmaceutical & Medical

Ausgang

Vergleich

Eingereicht: —

Erste Entscheidung: 23. Juli 2025

Sprache: —

Vergleich erfolgt: Vor Hauptsache — settled commercially

Court of Appeal (Panel 2) permitted Visibly Inc.'s withdrawal of its appeal against a Hamburg Local Division security-for-costs order in infringement proceedings concerning EP 3 918 974, following an out-of-court settlement between the parties. Easee companies had become insolvent and their CFI proceedings had been stayed. The Court of Appeal declared the appeal proceedings closed, confirmed no cost decision was needed (both parties waived costs), and ordered 60% reimbursement of appeal fees to Visibly (written proceedings not yet concluded).