UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC APP 32598/2025

·EP3918974: COMPUTERIZED REFRACTION AND ASTIGMATISM DETERMINATION

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Verfahrensart
Verfahrensantrag
Kategorie
Rücknahmeanträge
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter: Marc Grunwald (Peterreins Schley)
Beklagte
Vertreter: Wim Maas (Taylor Wessing N.V., Eindhoven)
Division
Court of Appeal
Richter
Technology
Pharmaceutical & Medical
Sprache
Erste Entscheidung
23. Juli 2025
Entscheidungen
  • 2025-07-23
    VergleichApplication Rop 265

    Court of Appeal (Panel 2) permitted Visibly Inc.'s withdrawal of its appeal against a Hamburg Local Division security-for-costs order in infringement proceedings concerning EP 3 918 974, following an out-of-court settlement between the parties. Easee companies had become insolvent and their CFI proceedings had been stayed. The Court of Appeal declared the appeal proceedings closed, confirmed no cost decision was needed (both parties waived costs), and ordered 60% reimbursement of appeal fees to Visibly (written proceedings not yet concluded).

    Rechtsfragen:Withdrawal of appeal following out-of-court settlement (R. 265.1 RoP by analogy)Stay of proceedings due to defendant insolvency (R. 295m RoP)Reimbursement of appeal court fees (R. 370.9(b)(i) RoP)
Dokumente
  • 869A265F063E76C3F44F118C652B88AF_en.pdf2025-07-23EN