Alle Fälle anzeigen
UPC APP 34714/2025
—·EP2515768: MOTOR-DRIVEN SURGICAL CUTTING INSTRUMENT WITH ELECTRIC ACTUATOR DIRECTIONAL CONTROL ASSEMBLY
- Verfahrensdetails
- Status—VerfahrensartVerfahrensantragKategorieVerfahrensführungsanordnungen
- Parteien
- BeklagteVertreter: Peter Koch (PENFORCE); Frank Meyer-Wildhagen (MFG Patentanwälte PartG mbB)
- Division
- Court of Appeal
- Richter
- Patricia Rombach · Legally Qualified Judge / Judge-Rapporteur
- Technology
- Electrical Components
- Sprache
- —
- Erste Entscheidung
- 15. Aug. 2025
Entscheidungen
- 2025-08-15Application Rop 223
Court of Appeal refused Rivolution's application for suspensive effect of its appeal against Munich Local Division's preliminary injunction granted to Cilag and Ethicon for infringement of EP 2 515 768. The Court held that in the absence of the grounds for decision, manifest error can only be established if the operative part pronounces a legal consequence not derived from the UPCA or RoP. No such manifest error was found.
Rechtsfragen:Application for suspensive effect (R. 223 RoP, Art. 74 UPCA)Manifest error without grounds for decisionPreliminary injunction appeal
Dokumente
- Rivolution%20v%20Cilak%20Order%20susp.%20effect.ENpdf_.pdf2025-08-15GERMAN