UPC APP 35055/2024
—·EP3000239: SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR UNIVERSAL CONTROL OF ELECTRONIC DEVICES
- Verfahrensdetails
- Status—VerfahrensartVerfahrensantragKategorieSonstige prozessuale
- Parteien
- Beklagte
- ARM Limited
- Apical Limited
- Arm France SAS
- Arm Germany GmbH
- Arm Germany d.o.o
- Arm Ireland Limited
- Arm Poland Sp. z.o.o
- Arm Sweden AB
- Simulity Labs Limited
- SVF Holdco
Vertreter: Christoph Crützen (Mayer Brown LLP) - Division
- Court of Appeal
- Richter
- Rian Kalden · Presiding Judge and Rapporteur
- Ingeborg Simonsson · Legally Qualified Judge
- Patricia Rombach · Legally Qualified Judge
- Technology
- Computing & AI
- Sprache
- —
- Erste Entscheidung
- 19. Juni 2024
- 2024-06-19BerufungsentscheidungGeneric application
Court of Appeal (Panel 2) procedural order rejecting ICPillar LLC's application for suspensive effect of a Paris Local Division order requiring ICPillar to provide security for costs of EUR 600,000 (R. 158 RoP), and also rejecting ICPillar's subordinate request for expedition of the appeal. The Court held that suspensive effect under Art. 74(1) UPCA is in principle available for R. 220.2 RoP orders (notwithstanding R. 223.5 RoP), but that only exceptional circumstances justify granting it. No exceptional circumstances existed here – the risk of a default judgment if ICPillar fails to comply is an inherent feature of non-compliance, and is not sufficient to grant suspensive effect.
Rechtsfragen:Suspensive effect of appeal (Art. 74(1) UPCA / R. 223 RoP)Conflict between Art. 74 UPCA and R. 223.5 RoP – UPCA prevails (R. 1.1 RoP)Exceptional circumstances for granting suspensive effect to procedural appeal ordersSecurity for costs (R. 158 RoP)Expedition of appeal (R. 9.3(b) RoP / R. 225(e) RoP)
- 869BDE20F6E1A8CA9757E101F1682AE2_en.pdf2024-06-19EN