UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC APP 58871/2024

·[Not specified in excerpt]

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Verfahrensart
Vorbescheid
Kategorie
Vorab-Einrede
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter: Marc Grunwald
Beklagte
Vertreter: Wim Maas
Division
Hamburg LD
Richter
Sprache
Erste Entscheidung
18. Dez. 2024
Entscheidungen
  • 2024-12-18
    AbgewiesenZuständigkeitPreliminary objection

    Procedural order of the Hamburg Local Division rejecting a preliminary objection (Rule 19 RoP) filed by defendants Easee B.V., Yves Prevoo (director), and Easee Holding B.V. against Visibly Inc.'s patent infringement action. The court rejected the jurisdictional challenge, holding: (1) an alleged patent infringement constitutes a tort under Art. 7(2) Brussels I recast Regulation, giving the UPC jurisdiction over director liability claims as well; (2) the question whether a director can be held personally liable is a matter of the merits, not of jurisdiction. The court confirmed the Hamburg Local Division's competence under Art. 33(1)(a) UPCA based on the place where the alleged infringement may occur (Germany). Leave to appeal was granted.

    Rechtsfragen:Preliminary objection on jurisdiction (Rule 19 RoP)UPC jurisdiction over director liability claims in patent infringementArt. 7(2) Brussels I recast Regulation: patent infringement as tortArt. 33(1)(a) UPCA: competence based on place of infringementPersonal director liability: jurisdictional vs. merits question
Dokumente
  • B1BDB3686E77CD8F1FFAF3EFE23EE775_en.pdf2024-12-18ENGLISH