UPC APP 619/2025

—·EP3024163: RADIO COMMUNICATION DEVICE AND CONSTELLATION CONTROL METHOD

Verfahrensdetails: Status
—
Verfahrensart
Verfahrensantrag
Kategorie
Verfahrensführungsanordnungen
Parteien: Kläger
Panasonic Holdings Corporation
Vertreter: Christof Augenstein (Kather Augenstein); Jonas Block (Kather Augenstein); Miriam Kiefer (Kather Augenstein)
Beklagte
Xiaomi Inc.
Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Co. Ltd.
Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbH
Xiaomi Technology France S.A.S.
Xiaomi Technology Italy S.R.L.
Xiaomi Technology Netherlands B.V.
Xiaomi H.K. Limited
Xiaomi Communications Co., Ltd.
Odiporo GmbH
Shamrock Mobile GmbH
Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd.
OROPE Germany GmbH
Vertreter: Henrik Lehment (Hogan Lovells International LLP); Benjamin Schröer (Hogan Lovells International LLP); Tobias J. Hessel (Clifford Chance)
Division: Munich LD
Richter: Matthias Zigann · Presiding judge and judge-rapporteur
Andras Kupecz · Legally qualified judge
Tobias Pichlmaier · Legally qualified judge
Kerstin Roselinger · Technically qualified judge
Technology: Telecommunications
Sprache: —
Erste Entscheidung: 25. Feb. 2025

Entscheidungen

2025-02-25
Nur KostenApplication Rop 333
Munich Local Division panel order reviewing (R. 333 RoP) the judge-rapporteur's earlier decision to refund only 40% of court fees following withdrawal of infringement actions and counterclaims (after out-of-court settlement) in patent proceedings by Panasonic Holdings Corporation against Xiaomi entities (UPC_CFI_220/2023) and Guangdong OPPO Mobile (UPC_CFI_221/2023) concerning EP 3 024 163. Panasonic argued a 60% refund was due. The panel confirmed the 40% refund rate, finding the withdrawals occurred after closure of the written procedure (R. 370.9(b)(ii) RoP).
Rechtsfragen:Court fee reimbursement rate upon withdrawal after settlement (R. 370.9(b) RoP)Review of judge-rapporteur's order on costs (R. 333 RoP)Timing of withdrawal relative to procedural stages

Dokumente