UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC CFI 1325/2025

·EP3653275

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Verfahrensart
Beweissicherung
Kategorie
Beweis & Inspektion
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter: Peter Koch (PENFORCE); Henricus van der Heijden (NLO B.V.)
Beklagte
Vertreter: Gerrit Schultz (Maucher Jenkins)
Division
Dusseldorf LD
Richter
Sprache
Erste Entscheidung
30. Okt. 2025
Letzte Entscheidung
23. Jan. 2026
Entscheidungen
  • 2026-01-23
    BeweisApplication for an Order for inspection pursuant to RoP199

    The Düsseldorf Local Division issued a further order in the Van Loon v. Inverquark evidence preservation proceedings, addressing the release of the expert's detailed description and a request for a supplementary expert opinion following the Aquanale Köln inspection.

    Rechtsfragen:Release of expert opinion (Art. 60 UPCA)Supplementary expert opinion requestConfidentiality of evidence preservation report
  • 2025-10-30
    BeweisApplication for an Order for inspection pursuant to RoP199

    The Düsseldorf Local Division granted an ex parte order for inspection and preservation of evidence at the Aquanale trade fair in Cologne regarding the defendants' 'InverJet' counter-current swimming device, in anticipation of a main infringement action.

    Rechtsfragen:R. 199 RoP ex parte inspection and preservation of evidence at trade fairCounter-current swimming device patent infringementConfidentiality obligations of inspection participants
Dokumente
  • 2025-10-30_Order_UPC_CFI_1325-2025.pdf2025-10-30DE
  • 2026-01-23%20Freigabe_signed_all.pdf2026-01-23DE