UPClytics
DeutschEnglish
AnmeldenRegistrieren
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC CFI 2307/2026

—·EP2422198 +3 more

Verfahrensdetails
Status
—
Verfahrensart
Einstweilige Verfügung
Kategorie
Einstweilige Maßnahmen
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter: Marianne Schaffner (Gowling WLG (France) AARPI); Charlotte Chambon (Gowling WLG (France) AARPI)
Beklagte
Vertreter: Stephan Neuhaus (A&O Shearman); Frits Gerritzen (A&O Shearman); Caroline Bley (A&O Shearman); Teresa Limberg (A&O Shearman); Sara Swinkels (A&O Shearman); Lasse Weinmann (Hoffmann Eitle); Boris Tchitchanov (Hoffmann Eitle); Elisabeth Engelhard (Hoffmann Eitle); Michael Pfeifer (Hoffmann Eitle); Dominik Scheible (Hoffmann Eitle); Sofie McPherson (Hoffmann Eitle); Daniel Offenbartl-Stiegert (Hoffmann Eitle)
Division
Munich LD
Richter
Sprache
—
Erste Entscheidung
20. Juli 2026
Entscheidungen
  • 2026-07-20
    Provisional measures

    The court rejected the respondents' application for an extension of the time period to file an objection to Oxford Nanopore's provisional measures application. The judge-rapporteur found that the time period (with a fixed deadline of 24 July 2026) was sufficient given the respondents' prior knowledge of the patents and the allegations from Australian proceedings, and that altering the schedule would prevent thorough panel preparation and necessitate a later oral hearing.

    Rechtsfragen:Extension of time period to file objection to provisional measures application (R. 206 RoP)Balance between respondent's right to be heard and applicant's right to fast and effective remediesEffect of inaccessibility to CMS case file on time period calculationRelevance of parallel foreign proceedings to time sufficiency
Dokumente
  • 4c5d1aa1-b8a3-4f08-bf12-1709129aa4a3.pdf2026-07-20EN