UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC CFI 449/2025

28. Mai 2025·EP2826630 +1 more · Fluid cartridge

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Case Closed
Verfahrensart
Einstweilige Verfügung
Kategorie
Einstweilige Maßnahmen
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter
Division
Dusseldorf LD
Technologie
  • Mechanical engineering
    Textile and paper machines
Sprache
English
Erste Entscheidung
16. Okt. 2025
Letzte Entscheidung
2. Feb. 2026
Im Vergleich
Die Bilanz des Gerichts für diese Art von Verfahren, gezählt in erstinstanzlichen Entscheidungen. Eine Zahl in Klammern gibt an, auf wie vielen Entscheidungen eine Quote beruht.
Einstweilige Verfügung erlassenMedian Tage bis zur ersten Entscheidung
Gesamt-UPC54% (38/70)124
Dusseldorf LDGesperrtGesperrt
Richter Ronny ThomasGesperrtGesperrt
Richter Jule SchumacherGesperrtGesperrt
Richter Rute LopesGesperrtGesperrt

Vor dem UPC: HP Group (22 Verfahren)·Zhuhai ouguan Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. (2 Verfahren)

Verwandte Verfahren
Entscheidungen
  • 2026-02-02

    Zusammenfassung: The Düsseldorf Local Division issued a further order of good service under R. 275.2 RoP for HP's printer patent PI proceedings against Zhuhai ouguan, after additional enquiries to China's central authority produced no further response, deeming service sufficient.

    Rechtsfragen anzeigen (2)
    • Order of good service (R. 275.2 RoP)
    • Extended delay by Chinese central authority
  • 2025-11-28
    Application for provisional measuresÖffentlich

    Zusammenfassung: The Düsseldorf Local Division granted a preliminary injunction against Zhuhai ouguan Electronic Technology (Defendant 1) for infringement of HP's printer-related patents EP 2 826 630 B1 and EP 3 530 469 B1 (ink cartridges), after service was deemed good and the defendant failed to file an objection; penalty payments of up to EUR 250,000 per day ordered.

    Rechtsfragen anzeigen (3)
    • Preliminary injunction by default after failure to file objection
    • R. 275.2 deemed good service
    • Ink cartridge and logic circuitry patent infringement
  • 2025-10-16

    Zusammenfassung: The Düsseldorf Local Division deemed service of an application for provisional measures on a Chinese defendant (Zhuhai ouguan) to be good service under R. 275.2 RoP, after service via the Hague Convention failed due to the defendant being untraceable at the provided address.

    Rechtsfragen anzeigen (3)
    • R. 275.2 RoP deemed good service
    • Service via Hague Convention failure
    • Provisional measures application service
DokumenttitelDatumÖffentlich
Verfahren abgeschlossen2026-02-11Nicht öffentlich
Anordnung2026-02-02Nicht öffentlich
Order2026-02-02Öffentlich
Cover sheet2025-12-16Nicht öffentlich
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-16Nicht öffentlich
Application document Claimant2025-12-16Nicht öffentlich
Receipt2025-12-16Nicht öffentlich
Entscheidung2025-11-28Nicht öffentlich
Final Order2025-11-28Öffentlich
Cover sheet2025-11-18Nicht öffentlich
Abdeckung: Teilweise.Begründung teilweise extrahiert — einige Abschnitte können unvollständig sein.
Zusammenfassung in einfacher Sprache

Hewlett-Packard sought and obtained a preliminary injunction from the Düsseldorf Local Division against Chinese manufacturer Zhuhai ouguan for infringement of two ink-cartridge patents (EP 2 826 630 B1 and EP 3 530 469 B1). The case established important procedural principles on deemed service under R. 275.2 RoP where the Hague Convention failed due to the defendant being untraceable, and on proceeding to a substantive PI order where the defendant, having been given the opportunity to object, failed to respond.

Angenommene Argumente
Was das Gericht akzeptiert hat — nach Partei.
  • Service on Chinese defendant Zhuhai ouguan via Hague Convention having failed, steps already taken constitute good service under R. 275.2 RoP

    KlägerRechtsgrundlage: R. 275.2 RoP; Art. 15(3) Hague Convention

    Hinweis: Court held that where Chinese authorities returned documents without effecting service and the applicant credibly demonstrated the address was correct, deemed service was appropriate; renewed attempt at formal service incompatible with urgency of PI proceedings.

  • Defendant's failure to file an objection after being invited to do so (R. 209.1(a)) entitles Court to decide PI application on applicant's submissions alone

    KlägerRechtsgrundlage: R. 209.1(a) RoP; R. 275.2 RoP

    Hinweis: Following the line from UPC_CFI_213/2025 (Aesculap) and the 3 September 2025 order in same case, the Court issued a regular PI order rather than a default decision.

  • HP's ink cartridges (Patents A and B) infringed by Zhuhai ouguan's devices

    KlägerRechtsgrundlage: EP 2 826 630 B1; EP 3 530 469 B1

    Hinweis: Preliminary injunction granted for both patents against Defendant 1 in specified UPC territories; penalty up to EUR 250,000 per day.

Zurückgewiesene Argumente
Was das Gericht nicht akzeptiert hat — und warum.
  • Application dismissed in all other aspects against Defendant 1

    KlägerRechtsgrundlage: R. 206 RoP

    Begründung: Certain aspects of the provisional measures application did not meet the legal requirements; exact grounds not detailed in the available excerpt.

Hinweise zur Anspruchsauslegung

The excerpt recites the full claim text of EP 3 530 469 B1 (ink cartridge with specific interface, guide, latch, and electrical circuit arrangement) as the basis for the injunction order, but no disputed claim terms or construction arguments are discussed.