UPC CFI 479/2025
30. Mai 2025·EP3522755 Einheitspatent · PIECE OF FURNITURE IN WHICH A WASHING MACHINE CAN BE PLACED AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURE THEREOF
- Verfahrensdetails
- StatusCase ClosedVerfahrensartEinstweilige VerfügungKategorieEinstweilige Maßnahmen
- Parteien
- Kläger
- Washtower IP B.V.Unternehmen
- Washtower B.V.Unternehmen
Vertreter- Peter van Schijndel-Hoyng Rokh Monegier
- Division
- The Hague LD
- Technologie
- Other fieldsConsumer products · Other consumer goods
- Sprache
- English
- Erste Entscheidung
- 17. Sept. 2025
- EPA-Einspruch
- BEGA BBK Sp. z o.o. sp. K.Zurückgenommen2026-01-02
| Einstweilige Verfügung erlassen | Median Tage bis zur ersten Entscheidung | |
|---|---|---|
| Gesamt-UPC | 54% (38/70) | 124 |
| The Hague LD | Gesperrt | Gesperrt |
| Richter Edger Brinkman | Gesperrt | Gesperrt |
| Richter Samuel Granata | Gesperrt | Gesperrt |
| Richter Margot Kokke | Gesperrt | Gesperrt |
| Richter Alessandro Sanchini | Gesperrt | Gesperrt |
Vor dem UPC: Washtower IP B.V. (6 Verfahren)
3 weitere Beklagte zum selben oder einem verwandten Patent
Starten Sie die kostenlose Testphase, um die Ausgänge zu sehen.
Weitere Verfahren: The Hague LD·2025
- 2025-09-17Application for provisional measuresÖffentlich
Zusammenfassung: The Hague Local Division granted provisional measures (preliminary injunction) against Defendants 2-5 (IBBH, BEGA Consult, BEGA BBK, NEG Novex) for infringement of EP 3 522 755 B1 (washing machine cabinet). The claim against Defendant 1 (Wasombouw) was settled. Injunctions ordered against specific infringing products (Laundreezy and Respekta Clara cabinets), with costs of EUR 56,000 plus court fees awarded against the defendants jointly.
Rechtsfragen anzeigen (4)
- Provisional measures / preliminary injunction
- Patent infringement (washing machine cabinets)
- Interim cost award (EUR 56,000)
- UPC-wide injunction
| Dokumenttitel | Datum | Öffentlich |
|---|---|---|
| Receipt | 2026-04-07 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Cover sheet | 2026-04-07 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Document Defendant | 2026-04-07 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Receipt | 2026-02-12 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Cover sheet | 2026-02-12 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Application document Claimant | 2026-02-12 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Verfahren abgeschlossen | 2025-11-08 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Schriftliches Verfahren abgeschlossen | 2025-11-08 | Nicht öffentlich |
| R. 118.8 order | 2025-09-17 | Öffentlich |
| Placeholder document | 2025-09-17 | Nicht öffentlich |
Washtower IP B.V. and Washtower B.V. obtained a preliminary injunction from The Hague Local Division against IBBH, BEGA Consult, BEGA BBK, and NEG Novex (Defendants 2-5) for infringement of EP 3 522 755 B1, covering washing machine cabinet furniture. The Court found the Laundreezy and Respekta Clara cabinets more likely than not infringing, and ordered injunctions, recall, and supply-chain information disclosure across all UPC states, with EUR 56,000 in legal costs awarded jointly against the defendants.
Defendants' Laundreezy and Respekta Clara washing machine cabinets fall within the scope of EP 3 522 755 B1
KlägerRechtsgrundlage: Art. 62 UPCA; R. 206 RoPHinweis: Court found it more likely than not that both product lines infringe the patent, granting injunctions against Defendants 2-5.
Urgency and necessity for provisional measures to stop ongoing infringement
KlägerRechtsgrundlage: Art. 62(1) UPCA; R. 206 RoPHinweis: Court accepted urgency and granted injunction covering all UPC Contracting Member States.
Information order necessary to stop further infringement (supply chain disclosure)
KlägerRechtsgrundlage: R. 354 RoP; Art. 62 UPCAHinweis: Court granted information orders on origin and distribution channels but limited scope to cessation of infringement, not damages calculation.
Recall order warranted to retrieve infringing products from professional customers
KlägerRechtsgrundlage: Art. 62 UPCAHinweis: Court ordered a recall letter to all professional customers in UPC Contracting Member States.
Information order extending to prices and numbers of cabinets sold (for damages calculation)
KlägerRechtsgrundlage: Art. 62 UPCA; R. 206 RoPBegründung: Court found no urgency or necessity for disclosure of commercial data relating to damages quantification at the provisional measures stage.
Weitere Fälle zu diesem Grundsatz ansehen.
No specific claim construction disputes are recorded in the excerpt. The Court applied EP 3 522 755 B1 claim scope to both the Laundreezy and Respekta Clara products and found them to fall within it.