UPC CFI 642/2025

Vor dem UPC: Laitram L.L.C. (2 Verfahren)·ScanBelt Modular Conveyor Systems A/S (2 Verfahren)

• 2026-09-14
  revocation counterclaim

  Zusammenfassung: Munich Local Division decision (Panel 1b, 25 Aug 2026; published 14 Sep 2026) in Laitram L.L.C. v ScanBelt Modular Conveyor Systems A/S (EP 3 251 983; infringement action UPC_CFI_642/2025 and counterclaim for revocation UPC_CFI_472/2026): on both parties' request the court confirms under Art. 79 UPCA and R. 365, R. 11.2 RoP that the parties concluded the settlement agreement of 15 Jul 2026, including its costs clause; no further cost decision is required and the details of the settlement are confidential, with only redacted versions entered in the register.

  Rechtsfragen anzeigen (3)

  • Confirmation of a settlement by decision of the court (Art. 79 UPCA; R. 365, R. 11.2 RoP)
  • Confidentiality of settlement terms (R. 365.2, 262.2 RoP)
  • Costs per the settlement (R. 365.4 RoP)
• 2026-04-02
  Infringement ActionÖffentlich

  Zusammenfassung: The court dismissed the defendant's second application to postpone the oral hearing scheduled for 8 December 2026. The court found that the defendant failed to present substantial grounds justifying a postponement, as the repeated assertion that the managing director was unavailable was unsubstantiated and no exceptional circumstances were demonstrated. Leave to appeal was not granted.

  Rechtsfragen anzeigen (5)

  • Application to postpone oral hearing
  • Substantial grounds required for postponement after date is set
  • Right to be heard vs. principles of expediency and procedural concentration
  • Defendant's failure to respond to scheduling invitation within deadline
  • Unavailability of managing director as grounds for postponement