UPC CFI 755/2024
3. Dez. 2024·EP1770912 · Method and system for 10BASE-T start-up
- Verfahrensdetails
- StatusCase ClosedVerfahrensartEinstweilige VerfügungKategorieEinstweilige Maßnahmen
- Parteien
- KlägerVertreter
- Florian Oliver Gunther Schmidt-Bogatzky-EIP Europe LLP
- Schmidt-Bogatzky-EIP Europe LLP
Beklagte- Realtek Semiconductor CorporationUnternehmen
- Division
- Munich LD
- Technologie
- Electrical engineeringDigital communication
- Sprache
- German
- Erste Entscheidung
- 9. Dez. 2024
| Einstweilige Verfügung erlassen | Median Tage bis zur ersten Entscheidung | |
|---|---|---|
| Gesamt-UPC | 54% (38/70) | 124 |
| Munich LD | Gesperrt | Gesperrt |
| Richter Ulrike Voß | Gesperrt | Gesperrt |
| Richter Daniel Voss | Gesperrt | Gesperrt |
| Richter Walter Schober | Gesperrt | Gesperrt |
Vor dem UPC: Broadcom Group (52 Verfahren)·Realtek Semiconductor Corporation (3 Verfahren)
Dieser Streit umfasst 2 weitere Verfahren
4 weitere Beklagte zum selben oder einem verwandten Patent
UPC CFI 2282/2025·UPC CFI 504/2024·UPC CFI 208/2024·UPC CFI 52/2023
Starten Sie die kostenlose Testphase, um die Ausgänge zu sehen.
- 2024-12-09Application for provisional measuresÖffentlich
Zusammenfassung: The Munich Local Division issued a rectification order (R. 353 RoP) correcting a factual error in the anti-suit/anti-enforcement injunction order of 9 December 2024 against Realtek Semiconductor, clarifying language about the prior license agreement between Avago's predecessor and Realtek.
Rechtsfragen anzeigen (2)
- Rectification of decision (R. 353 RoP)
- Anti-suit/anti-enforcement injunction
- —
Zusammenfassung: The Munich Local Division granted Avago Technologies an anti-suit/anti-enforcement injunction preventing Realtek Semiconductor from pursuing an anti-enforcement injunction in US proceedings that would block Avago from enforcing EP 1 770 912 before UPC courts, holding the UPC has jurisdiction for such provisional measures under Art. 32(1)(a)(c) UPCA.
Rechtsfragen anzeigen (3)
- anti-suit injunction / anti-enforcement injunction Art. 32(1)(a)(c) UPCA
- UPC jurisdiction for AASI/AAEI
- Art. 47 EU Charter access to justice
| Dokumenttitel | Datum | Öffentlich |
|---|---|---|
| Headnote-and-Keyword-Translated | 2025-01-29 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Berichtigung | 2025-01-28 | Öffentlich |
| Headnote-and-Keywords | 2025-01-27 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Outcome of the Order | 2025-01-27 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Gebührenerstattung | 2025-01-27 | Öffentlich |
| 20250127_63549.2024_App_2740.2025_EIP StN | 2025-01-27 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Hinweis | 2025-01-20 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Receipt | 2025-01-16 | Nicht öffentlich |
| 20250116_63549.2024_App_2740.2025_EIP_Antrag | 2025-01-16 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Headnote-and-Keyword-Translated | 2025-01-16 | Nicht öffentlich |
Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited sought provisional measures from the Munich Local Division against Realtek Semiconductor Corporation concerning EP 1 770 912 B1 (a 10BASE-T automotive Ethernet start-up method), after Realtek obtained a Taiwanese anti-suit/anti-enforcement injunction to block UPC proceedings. The court accepted jurisdiction and issued an anti-anti-suit protective order, finding that foreign anti-suit injunctions violate EU and German rights of access to justice; a subsequent rectification order (R. 353 RoP) corrected factual language about the predecessor's licence agreement.
UPC has jurisdiction under Art. 32(1)(a) and (c) UPCA to grant anti-suit/anti-enforcement injunctions against foreign anti-suit injunctions
KlägerRechtsgrundlage: Art. 32(1)(a)(c) UPCA; Art. 47 EU Charter; Art. 2(1) / 19(4) GG; §823(1) BGBHinweis: Munich Local Division accepted that foreign anti-suit/anti-enforcement injunctions threaten access to justice under EU and German constitutional law, giving the UPC jurisdiction to issue protective provisional measures.
Anti-suit injunction obtained by Realtek in Taiwan is contrary to the general European right to access to justice
KlägerRechtsgrundlage: Art. 47 EU Charter; German JustizgewährungsanspruchHinweis: Court accepted that foreign anti-suit/anti-enforcement prohibitions violate the general European right to access courts and the German constitutional right to court access.
Special circumstances under R. 211.5 RoP can be established by the allegedly long duration of obtaining security
KlägerRechtsgrundlage: R. 211.5 RoPBegründung: Special circumstances for purposes of R. 211.5 RoP cannot be founded merely on the purportedly long time to obtain security.
Weitere Fälle zu diesem Grundsatz ansehen.