UPC CoA 4/2026

Vor dem UPC: Valeo Group (34 Verfahren)·ROBERT BOSCH DOO Beograd (6 Verfahren)

• 2026-04-03
  Simultaneous InterpretationÖffentlich

  Zusammenfassung: The Court of Appeal rejected the Respondents' request for simultaneous interpretation (R. 109 RoP) for the hearing scheduled on 27 April 2026. The judge-rapporteur ordered that the hearing would be conducted in English, accommodating both parties' practical preparation in that language without prejudicing the pending appeal decision on the language of proceedings in UPC_CFI_809/2025.

  Rechtsfragen anzeigen (4)

  • Request for simultaneous interpretation under R. 109 RoP
  • Language of proceedings in appeal before Court of Appeal
  • Representative's oral proficiency in language of proceedings
  • Flexible and balanced procedure under UPC preamble
• 2026-02-11
  Appeal RoP220.2Öffentlich

  Zusammenfassung: Court of Appeal ruled on the admissibility of Valeo's appeal against the CFI's order on a preliminary objection. The appeal was declared admissible under R.220.2 RoP. The CoA also rejected Bosch's alternative request for a stay of the first-instance proceedings pending the appeal, finding that no exceptional circumstances justified a stay. The admissibility ruling concerned the correct appeal route where the judge-rapporteur allowed a preliminary objection but did not terminate proceedings as to all defendants.

  Rechtsfragen anzeigen (3)

  • Admissibility of appeal against preliminary objection order (R.220.1, R.220.2 RoP, Art.73 UPCA)
  • Appeal route for order allowing preliminary objection without terminating proceedings
  • Stay of first-instance proceedings pending appeal (R.21.2 RoP)
• 2026-01-21
  Appeal RoP220.2Öffentlich

  Zusammenfassung: Court of Appeal procedural order in the Valeo v. Bosch appeal concerning jurisdiction and language of proceedings. Paris Central Division had granted Bosch's preliminary objection, ordering transfer to Düsseldorf Local Division with English as language. Valeo appealed under R. 220.2 RoP requesting the Court of Appeal rule Paris Central Division has jurisdiction and French is the language.

  Rechtsfragen anzeigen (4)

  • Jurisdiction of Central Division vs. Local Division (Art. 33 UPCA)
  • Language of proceedings
  • Appeal under R. 220.2 RoP
  • Preliminary objection on competence