UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen
Verfahrensdetails
Status
Case Closed (Klage abgewiesen)
Verfahrensart
Berufung
Kategorie
Hauptberufung
Parteien
Beklagte
Vertreter
  • Marcus Grosch
Division
Court of Appeal
Sprache
English
Erste Entscheidung
14. Mai 2025
Entscheidungen
  • 2025-05-14
    Request for a discretionary review (RoP 220.3)Öffentlich

    Zusammenfassung: The Court of Appeal (Standing Judge Patricia Rombach) dismissed Hisense, TCL, and LG's request for discretionary review (R. 220.3 RoP) and application for suspensive effect in the Corning v. Hisense/TCL/LG infringement proceedings (EP 3 296 274) before the Mannheim Local Division. The Court upheld the judge-rapporteur's refusal to separate proceedings for the competing defendant groups. Separation of proceedings is not required to protect confidential supply chain information; R. 262A RoP confidentiality orders offer an adequate alternative. The applications for suspensive effect were dismissed.

    Rechtsfragen anzeigen (5)
    • Separation of proceedings (R. 303.2 RoP)
    • Protection of confidential supply chain information
    • Discretionary review (R. 220.3 RoP)
    • Confidentiality club as alternative to separation (R. 262A RoP)
    • EU competition law and information exchange
Dokumente
DokumenttitelDatumÖffentlich
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2025-05-14Nicht öffentlich
Outcome of the Order2025-05-14Nicht öffentlich
Final order2025-05-14Öffentlich
Panel-Appointment2025-05-12Nicht öffentlich
Exhibit FBD 05 - Order Confirmation Separation rejected.pdf2025-05-12Nicht öffentlich
25-05-12_-_EP_274_-_Request_for_discretionary_review_-_CFI_819_2024.pdf2025-05-12Nicht öffentlich
Exhibit FBD 06 - Confirmation of payment - UPC 120525.pdf2025-05-12Nicht öffentlich
Exhibit FBD 04 - Comments Quinn.pdf2025-05-12Nicht öffentlich
Exhibit FBD 03 - Application Review R333.pdf2025-05-12Nicht öffentlich
Exhibit FBD 01 - Separation request.pdf2025-05-12Nicht öffentlich
Exhibit FBD 02 - Order Separation rejected.pdf2025-05-12Nicht öffentlich