Alle Fälle anzeigen
UPC CoA 886/2025
—·EP4201327: FLUID DELIVERY DEVICE WITH TRANSCUTANEOUS ACCESS TOOL, INSERTION MECHANISM AND BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING FOR USE THEREWITH
- Verfahrensdetails
- Status—VerfahrensartVerfahrensantragKategorieAkteneinsicht (RoP262)
- Parteien
- KlägerVertreter: Julia Nguyen (Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP)BeklagteVertreter: Marc Grunwald (Peterreins Schley); Frank Peterreins (Peterreins Schley); Mirko Weinert (Hoyng Rokh Monegier)
- Division
- Court of Appeal
- Richter
- Patricia Rombach · Legally qualified judge and judge-rapporteur
- Technology
- Packaging & Conveying
- Sprache
- —
- Erste Entscheidung
- 22. Dez. 2025
Entscheidungen
- 2025-12-22Application RoP262.1 (b)
The Court of Appeal granted Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP's application for access to written pleadings (Statement of Appeal and Statement of Response) filed in UPC_CoA_768/2024 (Insulet v. EOFlow), to the extent that redacted versions were available. The Court affirmed that a law firm qualifies as a member of the public under R. 262.1(b) RoP and does not need a bona fide third party behind the application. Commercial interest in understanding UPC decisions does not preclude access.
Rechtsfragen:Public access to register (R. 262.1(b) RoP)Standing of law firms as members of the publicRedacted access to pleadings
Dokumente
- Final%20decision%20Herbert%20Smith%20Freehills%20v%20Insulet%20and%20EOFLOW.pdf2025-12-22ENGLISH