UPC Analytics
ENDE

Forum strategy

Where to file. Per-division comparisons across PI grant rate, infringement-finding rate, time-to-decision, and case mix.

Head-to-head
Per-division comparison. Coloring: red = patentee-favorable rate above 66%, green = below 34%.
DivisionCasesDecidedPI grant rateInfringement rateRevocation rateMedian time-to-decision (days)Category
Court of Appeal4431100%100Appeals, Other
Munich LD3755460%67%100%174Infringement, Revocation
Dusseldorf LD2124675%64%100%182Infringement, Revocation
Mannheim LD1622567%198Infringement, Revocation
Paris CD1123030%265Revocation, Other
Hamburg LD891760%25%104Infringement, Provisional measures
The Hague LD771950%60%147Infringement, Provisional measures
Paris LD58130%60%113Infringement, Revocation
Milan LD471183%100%69Infringement, Revocation
Milan CD288100%0%231Revocation, Infringement
Nordic-Baltic RD224100%84Infringement, Other
Munich CD21783%156Revocation, Other
Brussels LD134200Infringement, Revocation
Lisbon LD1010%66Infringement, Provisional measures
Copenhagen LD70Infringement, Revocation
Vienna LD630%50%356Infringement, Revocation
Helsinki LD407Infringement, Revocation
Pendency by milestone
Median days from filing to each procedural milestone, per division. Backed by extracted procedural events.
DivisionFiling → defenseFiling → interim conferenceFiling → oral hearingFiling → first decision
Court of Appeal104 (3)33 (1)88 (14)100 (85)
Munich LD66 (7)380.5 (10)397 (20)174 (45)
Dusseldorf LD102 (2)527 (1)441 (9)182 (43)
Mannheim LD120 (3)336 (1)371 (11)198 (27)
Paris CD76 (4)276 (4)370 (7)265 (21)
The Hague LD126 (6)361 (1)431.5 (4)147 (19)
Paris LD104 (4)112 (6)366 (5)113 (13)
Milan LD163.5 (4)369.5 (4)432 (3)68.5 (14)
Hamburg LD217.5 (2)393 (2)98.5 (4)104 (15)
Munich CD99 (3)250.5 (4)291 (4)156 (10)
Milan CD73 (4)328 (1)349 (1)231 (5)
Brussels LD351 (1)199.5 (6)
Vienna LD356 (3)
Nordic-Baltic RD451 (1)84 (1)
Lisbon LD66 (1)
Helsinki LD7 (1)
Distribution per milestone
Box-and-whisker shows the spread per division for each milestone (Q1–Q3 box, median line, min/max whiskers).

Filing → defense

Munich LD (7)The Hague LD (6)Milan CD (4)Milan LD (4)Paris CD (4)Paris LD (4)Court of Appeal (3)Mannheim LD (3)Munich CD (3)050100150200days

Filing → interim conference

Munich LD (10)Paris LD (6)Paris CD (4)Munich CD (4)Milan LD (4)0100200300400500days

Filing → oral hearing

Munich LD (20)Court of Appeal (14)Mannheim LD (11)Dusseldorf LD (9)Paris CD (7)Paris LD (5)Hamburg LD (4)The Hague LD (4)Munich CD (4)Milan LD (3)0100200300400500600days

Filing → first decision

Court of Appeal (85)Munich LD (45)Dusseldorf LD (43)Mannheim LD (27)Paris CD (21)The Hague LD (19)Hamburg LD (15)Milan LD (14)Paris LD (13)Munich CD (10)Brussels LD (6)Milan CD (5)Vienna LD (3)02004006008001000days
By technology
PI grant rate, infringement rate, time-to-decision broken down by technology area (Tier 1 L1).
Technology (L1)CasesDecidedPI grant rateInfringement rateRevocation rateMedian time-to-decision (days)
Telecoms2713650%100%190
Medical Devices1202850%0%220
Industrial Manufacturing1202782%50%265
Consumer Goods941975%38%428
Software & Computing627100%265
Biotech47950%100%145
Semiconductors45940%160
Automotive422100%111
Materials & Chemistry35667%217
Energy325100%244
Measurement & Instrumentation276100%50%287
Construction24750%421
Pharmaceuticals2220%466
Other210
Court of Appeal443 cases
PI grant rate0%
Infringement rate
Revocation rate
Median time-to-decision (days)100
Appeals (442) · Other (1)
Munich LD375 cases
PI grant rate60%
Infringement rate67%
Revocation rate100%
Median time-to-decision (days)174
Infringement (187) · Revocation (105) · Other (57)
Dusseldorf LD212 cases
PI grant rate75%
Infringement rate64%
Revocation rate100%
Median time-to-decision (days)182
Infringement (111) · Revocation (50) · Provisional measures (29)
Mannheim LD162 cases
PI grant rate
Infringement rate67%
Revocation rate
Median time-to-decision (days)198
Infringement (90) · Revocation (43) · Other (25)
Paris CD112 cases
PI grant rate
Infringement rate
Revocation rate30%
Median time-to-decision (days)265
Revocation (75) · Other (27) · Infringement (6)
Hamburg LD89 cases
PI grant rate60%
Infringement rate25%
Revocation rate
Median time-to-decision (days)104
Infringement (49) · Provisional measures (16) · Revocation (14)
The Hague LD77 cases
PI grant rate50%
Infringement rate60%
Revocation rate
Median time-to-decision (days)147
Infringement (49) · Provisional measures (13) · Revocation (11)
Paris LD58 cases
PI grant rate0%
Infringement rate60%
Revocation rate
Median time-to-decision (days)113
Infringement (32) · Revocation (16) · Other (7)
Milan LD47 cases
PI grant rate83%
Infringement rate100%
Revocation rate
Median time-to-decision (days)69
Infringement (24) · Revocation (11) · Provisional measures (7)
Milan CD28 cases
PI grant rate
Infringement rate100%
Revocation rate0%
Median time-to-decision (days)231
Revocation (20) · Infringement (3) · Appeals (2)
Nordic-Baltic RD22 cases
PI grant rate
Infringement rate100%
Revocation rate
Median time-to-decision (days)84
Infringement (11) · Other (5) · Revocation (5)
Munich CD21 cases
PI grant rate
Infringement rate
Revocation rate83%
Median time-to-decision (days)156
Revocation (19) · Other (2)
Brussels LD13 cases
PI grant rate
Infringement rate
Revocation rate
Median time-to-decision (days)200
Infringement (8) · Revocation (3) · Other (1)
Lisbon LD10 cases
PI grant rate0%
Infringement rate
Revocation rate
Median time-to-decision (days)66
Infringement (5) · Provisional measures (3) · Revocation (1)
Copenhagen LD7 cases
PI grant rate
Infringement rate
Revocation rate
Median time-to-decision (days)
Infringement (4) · Revocation (2) · Provisional measures (1)
Vienna LD6 cases
PI grant rate0%
Infringement rate50%
Revocation rate
Median time-to-decision (days)356
Infringement (3) · Revocation (2) · Provisional measures (1)
Helsinki LD4 cases
PI grant rate
Infringement rate
Revocation rate
Median time-to-decision (days)7
Infringement (2) · Revocation (1) · Provisional measures (1)