UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases1Decisions3Judges7Parties3Firms
Filing trendsOutcomesPendencyTechnologyForum strategyLeading casesLegal issuesSecurity for costs

Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

Legal principle60% court fee reimbursement where withdrawal before closure of written procedure (R. 370.9(b)(i))Clear all

Filtering to principle: 60% court fee reimbursement where withdrawal before closure of written procedure (R. 370.9(b)(i))

Clear principle filter
Most-litigated legal principles
Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.
PrincipleCasesDecidedPatentee success
withdrawal of action permitted where no legitimate interest of defendants in a court decision exists110%
settlement between claimant and principal defendant justifies withdrawal as against all defendants110%
60% court fee reimbursement where withdrawal before closure of written procedure (r. 370.9(b)(i))110%
parties may agree each bears own extrajudicial costs; court gives effect to such agreement110%
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.

No rejected-argument data in the current scope.

Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.

No prior-art data in the current scope.