UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases1Decisions4Judges2Parties0Firms
Filing trendsOutcomesPendencyTechnologyForum strategyLeading casesLegal issuesSecurity for costs

Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

Legal principleCourt has discretion under R. 370(9)(e) RoP to deny or reduce reimbursement in exceptional casesClear all

Filtering to principle: Court has discretion under R. 370(9)(e) RoP to deny or reduce reimbursement in exceptional cases

Clear principle filter
Most-litigated legal principles
Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.
PrincipleCasesDecidedPatentee success
settlement under r. 365(1) rop entitles liable parties to reimbursement of court fees under r. 370(9)(c) rop110%
outstanding unpaid court fees are set off against reimbursement of already-paid fees110%
court has discretion under r. 370(9)(e) rop to deny or reduce reimbursement in exceptional cases110%
rop does not prevent court from adopting a pragmatic approach to fees during mediation/settlement negotiations110%
court may optimise the negotiation framework by not requiring advance payment of fees subsequently to be reimbursed at 40%110%
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.

No rejected-argument data in the current scope.

Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.

No prior-art data in the current scope.