UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases1Decisions4Judges2Parties1Firms
Filing trendsOutcomesPendencyTechnologyForum strategyLeading casesLegal issuesSecurity for costs

Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

Legal principleDefendant must show due diligence and absence of undue prejudice to admit late invalidity attacksClear all

Filtering to principle: Defendant must show due diligence and absence of undue prejudice to admit late invalidity attacks

Clear principle filter
Most-litigated legal principles
Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.
PrincipleCasesDecidedPatentee success
new prior art in rejoinder to revocation counterclaim treated as expansion requiring justification (r. 263 rop)11100%
defendant must show due diligence and absence of undue prejudice to admit late invalidity attacks11100%
same diligence test applies when existing prior art is re-deployed for a new attack in the rejoinder11100%
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.
ArgumentPartyCases
new prior art and new invalidity attacks raised for the first time in the rejoinder to revocation counterclaimRespondent1
Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.

No prior-art data in the current scope.