UPC Analytics
ENDE

Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

Filtering to principle: Exhaustion under Art. 29 UPCA assessed on specific facts of authorised first placing on market

Clear principle filter
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.
ArgumentPartyCases
patent ep 2 061 575 b1 lacks inventive step based on named prior art documents (revocation counterclaim)Respondent1
recall, removal from channels of commerce, and destruction ordered for indirectly infringing productsClaimant1
interim award of lump-sum damages (r. 119 rop) without specific factual basisClaimant1
exhaustion defence: products supplied by patent holder exhaust patent rightsRespondent1
Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.

No prior-art data in the current scope.