UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases1Decisions4Judges3Parties1Firms
Filing trendsOutcomesPendencyTechnologyForum strategyLeading casesLegal issuesSecurity for costs

Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

Legal principleIndependent co-defendants are not subject to joint and several liability for PI compliance ordersClear all

Filtering to principle: Independent co-defendants are not subject to joint and several liability for PI compliance orders

Clear principle filter
Most-litigated legal principles
Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.
PrincipleCasesDecidedPatentee success
declaration of 'goods suspected of infringing' under eu customs regulation 608/2013 is not available as a provisional measure11100%
information orders in pi proceedings are limited to distribution channels and origins; financial data (pricing, volumes) is premature as it relates to damages11100%
independent co-defendants are not subject to joint and several liability for pi compliance orders11100%
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.
ArgumentPartyCases
declaration that glucomen ican is 'goods suspected of infringing an ip right' under eu regulation 608/2013 should be granted as a provisional measureClaimant1
information order should include price, sales numbers, and cost dataClaimant1
information disclosure should be subject to confidentialityRespondent1
Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.

No prior-art data in the current scope.