UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases2Decisions4Judges2Parties0Firms
Filing trendsOutcomesPendencyTechnologyForum strategyLeading casesLegal issuesSecurity for costs

Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

Legal principleIndirect infringement raised for the first time at oral hearing is inadmissible (R. 263.2(b) RoP)Clear all

Filtering to principle: Indirect infringement raised for the first time at oral hearing is inadmissible (R. 263.2(b) RoP)

Clear principle filter
Most-litigated legal principles
Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.
PrincipleCasesDecidedPatentee success
infringement assertion: where defendant disputes a feature with sufficient substantiation, claimant must submit specific facts about the accused embodiment110%
indirect infringement raised for the first time at oral hearing is inadmissible (r. 263.2(b) rop)110%
general common knowledge: the specific combination of features must itself be gck, not merely each individual element110%
skilled person must inevitably arrive at the claimed design when relying on gck; inventive steps are not permissible110%
both infringement action and revocation counterclaim dismissed: each side bears own costs110%
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.
ArgumentPartyCases
direct infringement of ep 2 746 967 by texas instruments' processors implementing dvfsClaimant1
general common knowledge (gck) supports inventive step challenge for claim feature subsetRespondent1
Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.

No prior-art data in the current scope.