UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases2Decisions4Judges3Parties0Firms
Filing trendsOutcomesPendencyTechnologyForum strategyLeading casesLegal issuesSecurity for costs

Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

Legal principlePatent upheld in opposition (B2 form) carries persuasive weight in infringement proceedingsClear all

Filtering to principle: Patent upheld in opposition (B2 form) carries persuasive weight in infringement proceedings

Clear principle filter
Most-litigated legal principles
Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.
PrincipleCasesDecidedPatentee success
direct infringement of all features of granted/amended claim 1 suffices for injunctive relief11100%
late-filed arguments/evidence at oral hearing may be disregarded11100%
patent upheld in opposition (b2 form) carries persuasive weight in infringement proceedings11100%
injunction conditions include notification and certified translation requirements before enforcement11100%
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.
ArgumentPartyCases
counterclaim for revocation: patent lacks validityRespondent1
alleged disproportionate harm from injunction (late-filed claim about magnitude of damage)Respondent1
Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.

No prior-art data in the current scope.