UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases1Decisions4Judges3Parties0Firms
Filing trendsOutcomesPendencyTechnologyForum strategyLeading casesLegal issuesSecurity for costs

Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

Legal principleSimultaneity requirement in DMA-based packet processing is a substantive claim limitationClear all

Filtering to principle: Simultaneity requirement in DMA-based packet processing is a substantive claim limitation

Clear principle filter
Most-litigated legal principles
Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.
PrincipleCasesDecidedPatentee success
claim construction must use description and express disclosures alongside claim wording (art. 69 epc)110%
simultaneity requirement in dma-based packet processing is a substantive claim limitation110%
non-infringement of main claim renders auxiliary request analysis unnecessary110%
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.
ArgumentPartyCases
cisco products implement the claimed dma-based simultaneous header-writing mechanismClaimant1
auxiliary requests establish infringement on alternative claim readingsClaimant1
Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.

No prior-art data in the current scope.