UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases2Decisions3Judges2Parties1Firms
Filing trendsOutcomesPendencyTechnologyForum strategyLeading casesLegal issuesSecurity for costs

Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

Legal principleSpecial circumstances under R. 211.5 RoP require more than the duration of obtaining securityClear all

Filtering to principle: Special circumstances under R. 211.5 RoP require more than the duration of obtaining security

Clear principle filter
Most-litigated legal principles
Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.
PrincipleCasesDecidedPatentee success
upc jurisdiction extends to provisional measures protecting applicants from foreign anti-suit and anti-enforcement injunctions (art. 32(1)(a)(c) upca)11100%
foreign anti-suit/anti-enforcement injunctions violate art. 47 eu charter and german constitutional access-to-justice rights11100%
r. 213.1 rop leaves the court no discretion11100%
special circumstances under r. 211.5 rop require more than the duration of obtaining security11100%
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.
ArgumentPartyCases
special circumstances under r. 211.5 rop can be established by the allegedly long duration of obtaining securityClaimant1
Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.

No prior-art data in the current scope.